|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [autoconf-archive]: using vague "freely" term in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
community/autoconf-archive 1:2017.03.21-1
A collection of freely re-usable Autoconf macros
See: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#FreelyAvailable
Don’t use “freely available software” as a synonym for “free software.” The terms are not equivalent. Software is “freely available” if anyone can easily get a copy. “Free software” is defined in terms of the freedom of users that have a copy of it. These are answers to different questions.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [beignet] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/beignet 1.3.1-2
An open source OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [bzrtp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/bzrtp 1.0.5-1
Opensource implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [cimg] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/cimg 1.7.1-1
Open-source C++ toolkit for image processing
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software C++ toolkit for image processing
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [clamtk] vague terminology "Linux" in description of pa ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Linux”:
community/clamtk 5.24-1
Easy to use, light-weight, on-demand virus scanner for Linux systems
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Linux” as operating system, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Linux” as operating system.
eg.
Easy to use, light-weight, on-demand virus scanner for GNU/Linux systems
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [displaycal] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/displaycal 3.2.4.0-1
Open Source Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free Software Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dokuwiki] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dokuwiki 20170219_b-1
Simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Simple to use and highly versatile free wiki software
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [drupal] vague terminology "Content" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Content”:
community/drupal 8.3.2-1
A PHP-based content management platform
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Content”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Content
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Content”.
eg.
A PHP-based web site revision system platform
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dsdp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dsdp 5.8-1
A free open source implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dspam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dspam 3.10.2-14
A scalable, open-source statistical anti-spam filter
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A scalable, free-software statistical anti-spam filter
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [ext3grep]: vague terminology "Content" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
Description:
community/ext3grep 0.10.2-4
A tool to investigate an ext3 file system for deleted content and possibly recover it
Description is vague because of the word “content”. Why not say instead “data”?
See: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Content
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [fcitx-mozc] vague terminology "Open Source" and "Linux ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source” and “Linux”:
community/fcitx-mozc 2.20.2673.102-2
Fcitx Module of A Japanese Input Method for Chromium OS, Windows, Mac and Linux (the Open Source Edition of Google Japanese Input)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source” and “Linux” as operating system, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source” and “Linux” as operating system. Also it should avoid contains nonfree OSs in its description.
eg.
Fcitx Module of A Japanese Input Method for GNU/Linux (the Free Software Edition of Google Japanese Input)
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear-data] vague terminology "Open Source" in de ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/flightgear-data 2017.1.3-1
Base-Data for the opensource flight-simulator.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Base-Data for the free-software flight-simulator.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/flightgear 2017.1.3-1
An open-source, multi-platform flight simulator
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software, multi-platform flight simulator
|
|
Any | Feature Request | Medium | Medium | [fossil] needs OpenRC init script | Closed | |
Task Description
$ pacman -Si fossil Repository : community Name : fossil Version : 2.2-1 Description : Simple, high-reliability, distributed software configuration management Architecture : x86_64 URL : http://www.fossil-scm.org Licenses : BSD Groups : None Provides : None Depends On : openssl zlib sqlite Optional Deps : None Conflicts With : None Replaces : None Download Size : 654.53 KiB Installed Size : 2122.00 KiB Packager : Anatol Pomozov anatol.pomozov@gmail.com Build Date : Mon 24 Apr 2017 11:41:22 PM -03 Validated By : MD5 Sum SHA-256 Sum Signature
$ pacman -Ql fossil fossil /etc/ fossil /etc/xinetd.d/ fossil /etc/xinetd.d/fossil fossil /usr/ fossil /usr/bin/ fossil /usr/bin/fossil fossil /usr/lib/ fossil /usr/lib/systemd/ fossil /usr/lib/systemd/system/ fossil /usr/lib/systemd/system/fossil.socket fossil /usr/lib/systemd/system/fossil@.service fossil /usr/share/ fossil /usr/share/bash-completion/ fossil /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/ fossil /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/fossil fossil /usr/share/licenses/ fossil /usr/share/licenses/fossil/ fossil /usr/share/licenses/fossil/LICENSE
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freehdl] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/freehdl 0.0.8-8
An open-source (C++ generating) VHDL simulator
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software (C++ generating) VHDL simulator
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freevo] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/freevo 1.9.0-14
An open-source home theatre PC platform
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software home theatre PC platform
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gerbv] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/gerbv 2.6.1-4
An open source Gerber file (RS-274X only) viewer
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software Gerber file (RS-274X only) viewer
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-wayland] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/glfw-wayland 3.2.1-1
A free, open source, portable framework for graphical application development (wayland)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, portable framework for graphical application development (wayland)
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-x11] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/glfw-x11 3.2.1-1
A free, open source, portable framework for graphical application development (x11)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, portable framework for graphical application development (x11)
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glide] vague terminology "Vendor" in description of pa ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Vendor”:
community/glide 0.12.3-1
Dependency management and vendoring for Go projects
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Vendor”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Vendor
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Vendor”.
eg.
Dependency management and suppliering for Go projects
|
|
Any | Feature Request | Medium | Medium | [glusterfs] needs OpenRC init script | Closed | |
Task Description
Contains systemd unit files:
/usr/lib/systemd/
/usr/lib/systemd/system/
/usr/lib/systemd/system/glusterd.service
/usr/lib/systemd/system/glustereventsd.service
/usr/lib/systemd/system/glusterfssharedstorage.service
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/glusterfs.conf
$ pacman -Si glusterfs
Repository : community
Name : glusterfs
Version : 1:3.10.1-1
Description : Is a cluster file-system capable of scaling to several peta-bytes.
Architecture : x86_64
URL : http://www.gluster.org/
Licenses : GPL2 LGPL3
Groups : None
Provides : None
Depends On : fuse python2 libxml2 libaio liburcu attr which
Optional Deps : rpcbind: NFS
glib2: qemu-block
Conflicts With : None
Replaces : None
Download Size : 3.14 MiB
Installed Size : 14.80 MiB
Packager : Sergej Pupykin <pupykin.s+arch@gmail.com>
Build Date : Fri 07 Apr 2017 06:29:27 AM -03
Validated By : MD5 Sum SHA-256 Sum Signature
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gmtp] vague terminology "MP3 Player" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “MP3 Player”:
community/gmtp 1.3.10-2
A simple MP3 player client for MTP based devices
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “MP3 Player”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#MP3Player
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “MP3 Player”.
eg.
A simple audio player client for MTP based devices
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [goaccess] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/goaccess 1.2-1
An open source real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gocr] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/gocr 0.50-2
Open-source character recognition (OCR)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software character recognition (OCR)
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [hyperion] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Feature Request | Very Low | Low | [i3lock-color] adding package into pacman | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [inn] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [irrlicht-docs] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [irrlicht] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [languagetool] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libasl] vague terminology "Free and Open Source hardwa ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libdlna] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libnoise] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libopenshot] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love08] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [lxlauncher-gtk3] vague terminology "Open Source" in de ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [lxlauncher] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [man-pages-de]: using kernel name without operating sys ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [man-pages-ru]: using kernel name without operating sys ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [man-pages-zh_cn]: using kernel name without operating ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [man-pages-zh_tw]: using kernel name without operating ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [manaplus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mathjax] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mediaproxy] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [metasploit] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Testing | Feature Request | Medium | Medium | [minbif] needs OpenRC init script | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mixxx] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mongodb] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|