|
Any | Feature Request | Very Low | Very Low | [ttf-iosevka] add Iosevka font | Closed | |
Task Description
Iosevka wins a poll about most beautiful fonts on reddit (/r/linux). This font is very similar than Droid Sans (Official Google Font) with many advantages:
1 - Has 5 types modes (lightest, light, normal, bold, super bold) 2 - Condensed and big sizes (perfect for visual impairments users) 3 - Very Legible on i3-wm, Sway, Conky bar 4 - OTF license (Freedom license)
Iosevka is already on AUR, but create a official package prevent bug or proprietary third parties apps (Yaourt, etc) be installed by beginners Hyperbola users.
Official Site: https://github.com/be5invis/Iosevka
On AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-iosevka
|
|
Any | Feature Request | Very Low | Low | [i3lock-color] adding package into pacman | Closed | |
Task Description
We already have i3lock, this version is an enhanced version available in Arch AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i3lock-color https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i3lock-color-git/
|
|
Any | Implementation Request | Very Low | Low | [plymouth] add package | Closed | |
Task Description
Plymouth is an application that runs very early in the boot process (even before the root filesystem is mounted!) that provides a graphical boot animation while the boot process happens in the background.
Please implement plymouth as an optional package.
|
|
Testing | Implementation Request | Very Low | Low | [sirikata] add package | Closed | |
Task Description
Sirikata a platform for virtual worlds.
Sirikata is a platform for virtual worlds. We provide a set of libraries and protocols which can be used to deploy a virtual world, as well as fully featured sample implementations of services for hosting and deploying these worlds.
Please implement sirikata as an optional package.
|
|
Any | Implementation Request | Very Low | Low | [multipath-tools] add package | Closed | |
Task Description
Hello,
Could it be possible to add this package :
multipath-tools
“Multipath tools for Linux (including kpartx)”
License : GPL2
to the repo ?
Thank you
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [beignet] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/beignet 1.3.1-2
An open source OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [bzrtp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/bzrtp 1.0.5-1
Opensource implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [cimg] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/cimg 1.7.1-1
Open-source C++ toolkit for image processing
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software C++ toolkit for image processing
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [displaycal] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/displaycal 3.2.4.0-1
Open Source Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free Software Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dokuwiki] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dokuwiki 20170219_b-1
Simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Simple to use and highly versatile free wiki software
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dsdp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dsdp 5.8-1
A free open source implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dspam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dspam 3.10.2-14
A scalable, open-source statistical anti-spam filter
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A scalable, free-software statistical anti-spam filter
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [fcitx-mozc] vague terminology "Open Source" and "Linux ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source” and “Linux”:
community/fcitx-mozc 2.20.2673.102-2
Fcitx Module of A Japanese Input Method for Chromium OS, Windows, Mac and Linux (the Open Source Edition of Google Japanese Input)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source” and “Linux” as operating system, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source” and “Linux” as operating system. Also it should avoid contains nonfree OSs in its description.
eg.
Fcitx Module of A Japanese Input Method for GNU/Linux (the Free Software Edition of Google Japanese Input)
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/flightgear 2017.1.3-1
An open-source, multi-platform flight simulator
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software, multi-platform flight simulator
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear-data] vague terminology "Open Source" in de ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/flightgear-data 2017.1.3-1
Base-Data for the opensource flight-simulator.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Base-Data for the free-software flight-simulator.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freehdl] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/freehdl 0.0.8-8
An open-source (C++ generating) VHDL simulator
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software (C++ generating) VHDL simulator
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freevo] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/freevo 1.9.0-14
An open-source home theatre PC platform
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software home theatre PC platform
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gerbv] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/gerbv 2.6.1-4
An open source Gerber file (RS-274X only) viewer
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software Gerber file (RS-274X only) viewer
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-wayland] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/glfw-wayland 3.2.1-1
A free, open source, portable framework for graphical application development (wayland)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, portable framework for graphical application development (wayland)
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-x11] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/glfw-x11 3.2.1-1
A free, open source, portable framework for graphical application development (x11)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, portable framework for graphical application development (x11)
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [goaccess] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/goaccess 1.2-1
An open source real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gocr] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/gocr 0.50-2
Open-source character recognition (OCR)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software character recognition (OCR)
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [hyperion] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/hyperion 1.03.2-9
An opensource 'AmbiLight' implementation
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software 'AmbiLight' implementation
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [inn] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/inn 2.6.1-1
Complete open source Usenet system. De facto standard for handling news routing, news spool and serving the spool to customers.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Complete free software Usenet system. De facto standard for handling news routing, news spool and serving the spool to customers.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [irrlicht] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/irrlicht 1.8.4-1
An open source high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [irrlicht-docs] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [languagetool] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libasl] vague terminology "Free and Open Source hardwa ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libdlna] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libnoise] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libopenshot] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love08] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [lxlauncher] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [lxlauncher-gtk3] vague terminology "Open Source" in de ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [manaplus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mathjax] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mediaproxy] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [metasploit] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mixxx] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mongodb] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mosquitto] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [obs-studio] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opendkim] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opendmarc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openra] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openscenegraph] vague terminology "Open Source" in des ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opensips] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opensubdiv] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [pdfsam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|