|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openra] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/openra 20170421-1
An open-source implementation of the Red Alert engine using .NET/Mono and OpenGL
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software implementation of the Red Alert engine using .NET/Mono and OpenGL
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [openmw]: referring to assets in description | Closed | |
Task Description
Description:
The description of the package need to be changed to accommodate:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html
To refer to published works as “assets”, or “digital assets”, is even worse than calling them “content” — it presumes they have no value to society except commercial value.
community/openmw 0.41.0-3.hyperbola1
A libre engine reimplementation for Morrowind-based role-playing games, without wizard installation support to install nonfree assets from Morrowind to run Morrowind
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjpeg] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/openjpeg 1.5.2-1
An open source JPEG 2000 codec
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software JPEG 2000 codec
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjpeg2] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/openjpeg2 2.1.2-2
An open source JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjdk8-src] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
no task description |
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjdk7-src] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
no task description |
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opendmarc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/opendmarc 1.3.2-1
Free open source software implementation of the DMARC specification
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of the DMARC specification
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opendkim] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/opendkim 2.10.3-4
An open source implementation of the DKIM sender authentication system. Based on a fork of dkim-milter.
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of the DKIM sender authentication system. Based on a fork of dkim-milter.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opencore-amr] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
Open source implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
Free software implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [open-isns]: using kernel name instead of operating sys ... | Closed | |
Task Description
Description:
community/open-isns 0.97-3
iSNS server and client for Linux
See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [ode] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/ode 0.14-1
An open source, high performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, high performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [obs-studio] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/obs-studio 18.0.2-1
Free, open source software for live streaming and recording
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software for live streaming and recording
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [nss_ldap]: referring to kernel name as operating syste ... | Closed | |
Task Description
extra/nss_ldap 265-6
The nss_ldap module provides the means for Linux and Solaris workstations to resolve the ent ities defined in RFC 2307 from LDAP directories.
See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
Description is referring to operating system, and not to the kernel itself (Linux). It shall be amended.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [notepadqq]: using kernel name instead of operating sys ... | Closed | |
Task Description
Description:
community/notepadqq 1.0.1-1
Notepad++-like text editor for Linux
See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [nmon]: using kernel name without operating system name | Closed | |
Task Description
Description:
community/nmon 16g-1
AIX & Linux Performance Monitoring tool
See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [net-tools]: using word "Linux" in vague manner | Closed | |
Task Description
core/net-tools 1.60.20160710git-1
Configuration tools for Linux networking
See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [ndiswrapper-dkms] vague terminology "Vendor" in descri ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Vendor”:
community/ndiswrapper-dkms 1.60.20160717-1
Module for NDIS (Windows Network Drivers) drivers supplied by vendors.Use with DKMS
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Vendor”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Vendor
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Vendor”.
eg.
Module for NDIS (Windows Network Drivers) drivers.Use with DKMS
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [mp3wrap] mentioning in description to be "alternative" ... | Closed | |
Task Description
Description:
The description of the package need to be changed to accommodate:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html
extra/mp3wrap 0.5-4
Tool for wrapping mp3 files. A free independent alternative to AlbumWrap
Description is pointing to proprietary software, it should not, it shall be changed.
It is not alternative to proprietary, and description shall be changed. It gives some kind of legitimacy to proprietary software.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mosquitto] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mosquitto 1.4.11-5
An Open Source MQTT v3.1/v3.1.1 Broker
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software MQTT v3.1/v3.1.1 Broker
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mongodb] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mongodb 3.4.3-1
A high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A high-performance, free software, schema-free document-oriented database
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Medium | [mongodb] needs OpenRC init script | Closed | |
Task Description
Description:
needs OpenRC init script
Additional info:
* mongodb-3.4.3-1
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mlt] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/mlt 6.4.1-6
An open source multimedia framework
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software multimedia framework
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mlt-python-bindings] vague terminology "Open Source" i ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/mlt-python-bindings 6.4.1-6
An open source multimedia framework
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software multimedia framework
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mixxx] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mixxx 2.0.0-8
Free, open source software for digital DJ'ing.
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software for digital DJ'ing.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [metasploit] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/metasploit 4.13.22-1
Advanced open-source platform for developing, testing, and using exploit code
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Advanced free-software platform for developing, testing, and using exploit code
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mediaproxy] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mathjax] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [manaplus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [man-pages]: using term "Linux" | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very High | Critical | [man-pages] contains nonfree POSIX manual pages | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [man-pages-zh_tw]: using kernel name without operating ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [man-pages-zh_cn]: using kernel name without operating ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [man-pages-ru]: using kernel name without operating sys ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [man-pages-de]: using kernel name without operating sys ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [lxlauncher] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [lxlauncher-gtk3] vague terminology "Open Source" in de ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [luminancehdr] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very High | Critical | [luminancehdr] depends on non-free qt5-webengine | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love08] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [linux-atm]: using term "under Linux" in vague sense | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [linssid]: using kernel name instead of operating syste ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [libva]: referring to operating system by using kernel ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libupnp] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libspnav] vague terminology "Alternative" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [libspnav] extra/libspnav 0.2.3-1, mentions "alternativ ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [libsmf]: referring to "BSD-licensed" in description | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libopenshot] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libomxil-bellagio] vague terminology "Open Source" in ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libofa] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
