|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [metasploit] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/metasploit 4.13.22-1
Advanced open-source platform for developing, testing, and using exploit code
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Advanced free-software platform for developing, testing, and using exploit code
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mixxx] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mixxx 2.0.0-8
Free, open source software for digital DJ'ing.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software for digital DJ'ing.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mongodb] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mongodb 3.4.3-1
A high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A high-performance, free software, schema-free document-oriented database
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mosquitto] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mosquitto 1.4.11-5
An Open Source MQTT v3.1/v3.1.1 Broker
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software MQTT v3.1/v3.1.1 Broker
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [obs-studio] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/obs-studio 18.0.2-1
Free, open source software for live streaming and recording
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software for live streaming and recording
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [ode] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/ode 0.14-1
An open source, high performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, high performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opendkim] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/opendkim 2.10.3-4
An open source implementation of the DKIM sender authentication system. Based on a fork of dkim-milter.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of the DKIM sender authentication system. Based on a fork of dkim-milter.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opendmarc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/opendmarc 1.3.2-1
Free open source software implementation of the DMARC specification
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of the DMARC specification
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openra] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/openra 20170421-1
An open-source implementation of the Red Alert engine using .NET/Mono and OpenGL
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software implementation of the Red Alert engine using .NET/Mono and OpenGL
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openscenegraph] vague terminology "Open Source" in des ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/openscenegraph 3.4.0-5
An Open Source, high performance real-time graphics toolkit
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software, high performance real-time graphics toolkit
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opensips] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/opensips 2.2.3-1
An Open Source SIP Server able to act as a SIP proxy, registrar, location server, redirect server ...
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software SIP Server able to act as a SIP proxy, registrar, location server, redirect server ...
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opensubdiv] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/opensubdiv 3.1.1-1 [installed]
An Open-Source subdivision surface library
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software subdivision surface library
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [pdfsam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/pdfsam 3.3.0-1
A free open source tool to split and merge pdf documents
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software tool to split and merge pdf documents
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [pokerth] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/pokerth 1.1.1-17
Open source Texas Hold'em Poker simulator
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software Texas Hold'em Poker simulator
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [polymake] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/polymake 3.1-1
Open source software for research in polyhedral geometry
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software for research in polyhedral geometry
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [portaudio] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/portaudio 190600_20161030-1
A free, cross-platform, open source, audio I/O library.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, cross-platform, audio I/O library.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [pymol] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/pymol 1.8.6.0-2
Molecular visualization system on an Open Source foundation
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Molecular visualization system on a Free Software foundation
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [python-scipy] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/python-scipy 0.19.0-1
SciPy is open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
SciPy is free software for mathematics, science, and engineering.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [python-tornado] vague terminology "Open Source" in des ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/python-tornado 4.5.1-1 [installed]
open source version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
free software version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [python2-scipy] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/python2-scipy 0.19.0-1 [installed]
SciPy is open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
SciPy is free software for mathematics, science, and engineering.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [python2-tornado] vague terminology "Open Source" in de ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/python2-tornado 4.5.1-1 [installed]
open source version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
free software version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [radare2] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/radare2 1.4.0-1
Open-source tools to disasm, debug, analyze and manipulate binary files
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software tools to disasm, debug, analyze and manipulate binary files
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [rdesktop] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/rdesktop 1.8.3-3
An open source client for Windows Remote Desktop Services
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software client for Windows Remote Desktop Services
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [repo] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/repo 1.12.37-1
The Multiple Git Repository Tool from the Android Open Source Project
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
The Multiple Git Repository Tool from the Android Free Software Project
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [simgear] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/simgear 2017.1.3-1
A set of open-source libraries designed to be used as building blocks for quickly assembling 3d simulations, games, and visualization applications.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A set of free-software libraries designed to be used as building blocks for quickly assembling 3d simulations, games, and visualization applications.
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [slrn] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [stone-soup] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [sysdig] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [tkabber] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [topbeat] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [ttf-overpass] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [unrealircd] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [wiredtiger] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xwax] vague terminology "Open Source" and "Linux" in d ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [zynaddsubfx] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libspnav] vague terminology "Alternative" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [bogofilter] vague terminology "Commercial" in descript ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [drupal] vague terminology "Content" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [clamtk] vague terminology "Linux" in description of pa ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [oprofile] vague terminology "Linux" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [shorewall] vague terminology "Linux" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [shorewall6] vague terminology "Linux" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gmtp] vague terminology "MP3 Player" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [kdb] vague terminology "Vendor" in description of pack ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [publicsuffix-list] vague terminology "Vendor" in descr ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glide] vague terminology "Vendor" in description of pa ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [ndiswrapper-dkms] vague terminology "Vendor" in descri ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [freecad] Steering users towards non-free software | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [libspnav] extra/libspnav 0.2.3-1, mentions "alternativ ... | Closed | |
|
|
Any | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Low | [classpath] meantioning "replacement to proprietary cod ... | Closed | |
|