All Projects

ProjectCategoryTask TypePriority  ascSeveritySummaryStatusProgress
PackagesStableBug ReportMediumMedium[virt-install] ERROR '_OsVariant' object has no attribu...Requires Testing
100%
Task Description

Trying to create a VM using virt-install (1.4.1-2.hyperbola2)

virt-install --connect qemu:///system \
--name debian \
--ram 1024 \
--disk path=/home/test/debian.img,size=50 \
--vcpus 2 \
--os-type linux \
--os-variant generic \
--network bridge=virbr0 \
--graphics none \
--console pty,target_type=serial \
--location 'http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/stretch/main/installer-amd64/' \
--extra-args 'console=ttyS0,115200n8 serial'

This error shows up :
ERROR : ‘_OsVariant’ object has no attribute ‘urldistro’

I can’t create the VM.

PS : Error is not present on Debian Stretch with virt-install 1.4.0-5

Thanks for your help.

PackagesAnyImplementation RequestMediumMedium[uzem][uzebox] add uzem emulator and uzebox firmware pa...Assigned
0%
Task Description

Add “uzem” emulator and “uzebox” firmware packages[0][1].

It’s a emulator and firmware for fully free 8bit game console.

[0]:http://belogic.com/uzebox/index.asp (no https found)
[1]:https://github.com/Uzebox/uzebox

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[unrealircd] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/unrealircd 4.0.11-2
    Open Source IRC Server

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free Software IRC Server
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[unixodbc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/unixodbc 2.3.4-2
    ODBC is an open specification for providing application developers with a predictable API with which to access Data Sources

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

ODBC is a free specification for providing application developers with a predictable API with which to access Data Sources
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[ttf-overpass] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/ttf-overpass 2.1-2
    An open source font family inspired by Highway Gothic esp. suited for signs, lettering and web sites

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software font family inspired by Highway Gothic esp. suited for signs, lettering and web sites
PackagesStableBug ReportMediumCritical[torsocks] which: no getcapRequires Testing
90%
Task Description

Current torsocks version is broken.
It returns the following error when attempting to torify application :

which: no getcap
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[topbeat] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/topbeat 1.3.1-1
    Open source server monitoring agent that stores metrics in Elasticsearch

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software server monitoring agent that stores metrics in Elasticsearch
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[tomcat8] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/tomcat8 8.0.42-1
    Open source implementation of the Java Servlet 3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 technologies

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software implementation of the Java Servlet 3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 technologies
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[tomcat7] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/tomcat7 7.0.76-1
    Open source implementation of the Java Servlet 3.0 and JavaServer Pages 2.2 technologies

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software implementation of the Java Servlet 3.0 and JavaServer Pages 2.2 technologies
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[tkabber] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/tkabber 1.1.2-1
    Tkabber is an open source Jabber client, written in Tcl/Tk.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Tkabber is a free software Jabber client, written in Tcl/Tk.
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[sysdig] vague terminology "Open Source" in description...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/sysdig 0.15.1-2
    Open source system-level exploration and troubleshooting tool

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software system-level exploration and troubleshooting tool
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[swt] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/swt 4.6.2-3
    An open source widget toolkit for Java

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software widget toolkit for Java
PackagesAnyFeature RequestMediumHigh[supervisor] contains systemd unit fileIn Progress
0%
Task Description

The Arch version of “supervisor” from the snapshot used by Hyperbola comes with systemd support. Since Hyperbola follows the a global ruleset for INIT-freedom, systemd unit files removal is required and adding support for other init-systems (preferred OpenRC for now) to replace it.

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[stone-soup] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/stone-soup 0.19.5-1
    Open-source, single-player, role-playing roguelike game of exploration and treasure-hunting

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free-software, single-player, role-playing roguelike game of exploration and treasure-hunting
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[sofia-sip] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/sofia-sip 1.12.11-3
    An open-source SIP User-Agent library

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free-software SIP User-Agent library
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[slrn] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/slrn 1.0.3-2
    An open source text-based news client

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software text-based news client
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[simgear] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/simgear 2017.1.3-1
    A set of open-source libraries designed to be used as building blocks for quickly assembling 3d simulations, games, and visualization applications.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A set of free-software libraries designed to be used as building blocks for quickly assembling 3d simulations, games, and visualization applications.
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[shorewall] vague terminology "Linux" in description of...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Linux”:

community/shorewall 5.1.4-1
    An iptables-based firewall for Linux systems

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Linux” as operating system, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Linux” as operating system.

eg.

An iptables-based firewall for GNU/Linux systems
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[shorewall6] vague terminology "Linux" in description o...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Linux”:

community/shorewall6 5.1.4-1
    An iptables-based firewall for Linux systems (with IPv6 support)

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Linux” as operating system, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Linux” as operating system.

eg.

An iptables-based firewall for GNU/Linux systems (with IPv6 support)
PackagesAnyImplementation RequestMediumMedium[searx] add new packageDeferred
0%
Task Description

Hi André, you could make an init for the searx search engine, it happens that
I want to launch it from local to avoid being in searx.me or
searx.riseup.net.

I have seen that there is a PKGBUILD in AUR [0]. I think it is necessary to make one with the init Openrc

[0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/searx-py3/

PackagesAnyBug ReportMediumMedium[rxvt-unicode] rc-status command print "bug" tableResearching
0%
Task Description

If you do a command line rc-status on urxvt terminal, the name of the column of services are hidden. You will only see the status columns. Example:

Runlevel: default
  started  ]
  started  ]
  started  ]
  started  ]
  started 00:36:20 (0) ]
  started 00:36:20 (0) ]
  started 00:36:20 (0) ]
  started 00:36:20 (0) ]
Dynamic Runlevel: hotplugged
Dynamic Runlevel: needed/wanted
  started  ]
  started  ]
  started  ]d
Dynamic Runlevel: manual
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[repo] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/repo 1.12.37-1
    The Multiple Git Repository Tool from the Android Open Source Project

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

The Multiple Git Repository Tool from the Android Free Software Project
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[rdesktop] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/rdesktop 1.8.3-3
    An open source client for Windows Remote Desktop Services

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software client for Windows Remote Desktop Services
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[radare2] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/radare2 1.4.0-1
    Open-source tools to disasm, debug, analyze and manipulate binary files

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free-software tools to disasm, debug, analyze and manipulate binary files
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python2-tornado] vague terminology "Open Source" in de...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/python2-tornado 4.5.1-1 [installed]
    open source version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

free software version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python2-scipy] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/python2-scipy 0.19.0-1 [installed]
    SciPy is open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

SciPy is free software for mathematics, science, and engineering.
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python2-biopython]: using vague "freely available" ter...Deferred
0%
Task Description
community/python2-biopython 1.69-1
    Freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#FreelyAvailable

Don’t use “freely available software” as a synonym for “free software.” The terms are not equivalent. Software is “freely available” if anyone can easily get a copy. “Free software” is defined in terms of the freedom of users that have a copy of it. These are answers to different questions.

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python-tornado] vague terminology "Open Source" in des...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/python-tornado 4.5.1-1 [installed]
    open source version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

free software version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python-scipy] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/python-scipy 0.19.0-1
    SciPy is open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

SciPy is free software for mathematics, science, and engineering.
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python-biopython]: using vague "freely" term in descri...Deferred
0%
Task Description
community/python-biopython 1.69-1
    Freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#FreelyAvailable

Don’t use “freely available software” as a synonym for “free software.” The terms are not equivalent. Software is “freely available” if anyone can easily get a copy. “Free software” is defined in terms of the freedom of users that have a copy of it. These are answers to different questions.

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[pymol] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/pymol 1.8.6.0-2
    Molecular visualization system on an Open Source foundation

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Molecular visualization system on a Free Software foundation
PackagesAnyFeature RequestMediumMedium[pybitmessage] Package RequestUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

PyBitmessage is a secure p2p e-mail alternative. It could be useful to package it.

https://github.com/Bitmessage/PyBitmessage/releases https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pybitmessage/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pybitmessage-git/ (contains a firejail profile)

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[publicsuffix-list] vague terminology "Vendor" in descr...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Vendor”:

extra/publicsuffix-list 20170118.560.45a2bf8-1
    Cross-vendor public domain suffix database

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Vendor”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Vendor

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Vendor”.

eg.

Cross-supplier public domain suffix database
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[portaudio] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/portaudio 190600_20161030-1
    A free, cross-platform, open source, audio I/O library.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software, cross-platform, audio I/O library.
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[polymake] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/polymake 3.1-1
    Open source software for research in polyhedral geometry

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software for research in polyhedral geometry
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[pokerth] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/pokerth 1.1.1-17
    Open source Texas Hold'em Poker simulator

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software Texas Hold'em Poker simulator
PackagesAnyUpdate RequestMediumHigh[php] is out of date/supportUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

From official PHP page, our php 7.1 is out of support and security

Our package :
https://www.hyperbola.info/packages/extra/x86_64/php/

PHP page :
https://www.php.net/supported-versions.php

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[pdfsam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/pdfsam 3.3.0-1
    A free open source tool to split and merge pdf documents

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software tool to split and merge pdf documents
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[oprofile] vague terminology "Linux" in description of ...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Linux”:

community/oprofile 1.1.0-3
    System-wide profiler for Linux systems

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Linux” as operating system, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Linux” as operating system.

eg.

System-wide profiler for GNU/Linux systems
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[opensubdiv] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/opensubdiv 3.1.1-1 [installed]
    An Open-Source subdivision surface library

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A Free Software subdivision surface library
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[openstreetmap-map-icons-svn]: using vague "public doma...Deferred
0%
Task Description

Description:

community/openstreetmap-map-icons-svn 31588-1 [installed]
    A set of public domain licensed map icons for general OSM use

It is questionable if it is “Licensed” or dedicated.

See the file:
/usr/share/licenses/openstreetmap-map-icons/svg-twotone/LICENSE.txt

it does not matter if the file is named “LICENSE”, it could be also named anyhow else.

There must be reason why the organization Creative Commons is not using the word “License” in that text, and that is why I propose to simply say in description:

    A set of public domain map icons for general OSM use
PackagesAnySecurity IssueMediumMedium[openssh] CVE-2018-15919Researching
0%
Task Description

Remotely observable behavior in auth-gss2.c in OpenSSH through 7.8 could be used by remote attackers to detect existence of users on a target system when GSS2 is in use. NOTE: the discoverer states ‘We understand that the OpenSSH developers do not want to treat such a username enumeration (or “oracle”) as a vulnerability.’ https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-15919

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[opensips] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/opensips 2.2.3-1
    An Open Source SIP Server able to act as a SIP proxy, registrar, location server, redirect server ...

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A Free Software SIP Server able to act as a SIP proxy, registrar, location server, redirect server ...
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[openscenegraph] vague terminology "Open Source" in des...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/openscenegraph 3.4.0-5
    An Open Source, high performance real-time graphics toolkit

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A Free Software, high performance real-time graphics toolkit
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[openra] vague terminology "Open Source" in description...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/openra 20170421-1
    An open-source implementation of the Red Alert engine using .NET/Mono and OpenGL

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free-software implementation of the Red Alert engine using .NET/Mono and OpenGL
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[openjpeg] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti...Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/openjpeg 1.5.2-1
    An open source JPEG 2000 codec

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software JPEG 2000 codec
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[openjpeg2] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/openjpeg2 2.1.2-2
    An open source JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[opendmarc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/opendmarc 1.3.2-1
    Free open source software implementation of the DMARC specification

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software implementation of the DMARC specification
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[opendkim] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/opendkim 2.10.3-4
    An open source implementation of the DKIM sender authentication system. Based on a fork of dkim-milter.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software implementation of the DKIM sender authentication system. Based on a fork of dkim-milter.
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[opencore-amr] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
    Open source implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
    Free software implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
Showing tasks 351 - 400 of 517 Page 8 of 11<<First - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - Last >>

Available keyboard shortcuts

Tasklist

Task Details

Task Editing