|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [beignet] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/beignet 1.3.1-2
An open source OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [bzrtp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/bzrtp 1.0.5-1
Opensource implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [cimg] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/cimg 1.7.1-1
Open-source C++ toolkit for image processing
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software C++ toolkit for image processing
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [displaycal] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/displaycal 3.2.4.0-1
Open Source Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free Software Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dokuwiki] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dokuwiki 20170219_b-1
Simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Simple to use and highly versatile free wiki software
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dsdp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dsdp 5.8-1
A free open source implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dspam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dspam 3.10.2-14
A scalable, open-source statistical anti-spam filter
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A scalable, free-software statistical anti-spam filter
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [fcitx-mozc] vague terminology "Open Source" and "Linux... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source” and “Linux”:
community/fcitx-mozc 2.20.2673.102-2
Fcitx Module of A Japanese Input Method for Chromium OS, Windows, Mac and Linux (the Open Source Edition of Google Japanese Input)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source” and “Linux” as operating system, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source” and “Linux” as operating system. Also it should avoid contains nonfree OSs in its description.
eg.
Fcitx Module of A Japanese Input Method for GNU/Linux (the Free Software Edition of Google Japanese Input)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/flightgear 2017.1.3-1
An open-source, multi-platform flight simulator
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software, multi-platform flight simulator
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear-data] vague terminology "Open Source" in de... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/flightgear-data 2017.1.3-1
Base-Data for the opensource flight-simulator.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Base-Data for the free-software flight-simulator.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freehdl] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/freehdl 0.0.8-8
An open-source (C++ generating) VHDL simulator
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software (C++ generating) VHDL simulator
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freevo] vague terminology "Open Source" in description... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/freevo 1.9.0-14
An open-source home theatre PC platform
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software home theatre PC platform
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gerbv] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/gerbv 2.6.1-4
An open source Gerber file (RS-274X only) viewer
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software Gerber file (RS-274X only) viewer
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-wayland] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/glfw-wayland 3.2.1-1
A free, open source, portable framework for graphical application development (wayland)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, portable framework for graphical application development (wayland)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-x11] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/glfw-x11 3.2.1-1
A free, open source, portable framework for graphical application development (x11)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, portable framework for graphical application development (x11)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [goaccess] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/goaccess 1.2-1
An open source real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gocr] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/gocr 0.50-2
Open-source character recognition (OCR)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software character recognition (OCR)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [hyperion] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/hyperion 1.03.2-9
An opensource 'AmbiLight' implementation
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software 'AmbiLight' implementation
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [inn] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/inn 2.6.1-1
Complete open source Usenet system. De facto standard for handling news routing, news spool and serving the spool to customers.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Complete free software Usenet system. De facto standard for handling news routing, news spool and serving the spool to customers.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [irrlicht] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/irrlicht 1.8.4-1
An open source high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [irrlicht-docs] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/irrlicht-docs 1.8.4-1
An open source high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [languagetool] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/languagetool 3.7-1
An open source language checker
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software language checker
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libasl] vague terminology "Free and Open Source hardwa... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Free and Open Source hardware”:
community/libasl 0.1.7-3
Free and open source hardware accelerated multiphysics simulation platform (Advanced Simulation Library)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source” and “Free and Open Source hardware”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-hardware-designs.html
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source” and “Free and Open Source hardware”.
eg.
Free-design hardware accelerated multiphysics simulation platform (Advanced Simulation Library)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libdlna] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/libdlna 0.2.4-16
Open-source implementation of DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance) standards
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software implementation of DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance) standards
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libnoise] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/libnoise 1.0.0-4
A portable, open-source, coherent noise-generating library for C++
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A portable, free-software, coherent noise-generating library for C++
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libopenshot] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/libopenshot 0.1.4-1
A high quality, open-source video editing, animation, and playback library for C++, Python, and Ruby.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A high quality, free-software video editing, animation, and playback library for C++, Python, and Ruby.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/love 0.10.2-1 [installed]
An open-source 2D game engine which uses the versatile Lua scripting language to create dynamic gaming experiences
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software 2D game engine which uses the versatile Lua scripting language to create dynamic gaming experiences
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love08] vague terminology "Open Source" in description... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/love08 0.8.0-2
An open-source 2D game engine which uses the versatile Lua scripting language to create dynamic gaming experiences
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software 2D game engine which uses the versatile Lua scripting language to create dynamic gaming experiences
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [lxlauncher] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/lxlauncher 0.2.5-2 (lxde)
Open source clone of the Asus launcher for EeePC
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software clone of the Asus launcher for EeePC
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [lxlauncher-gtk3] vague terminology "Open Source" in de... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/lxlauncher-gtk3 0.2.5-2 (lxde-gtk3)
Open source clone of the Asus launcher for EeePC (GTK+ 3 version)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software clone of the Asus launcher for EeePC (GTK+ 3 version)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [manaplus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/manaplus 1.7.4.15-1
Free OpenSource 2D MMORPG client for Evol Online, The mana world and similar servers
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free Software 2D MMORPG client for Evol Online, The mana world and similar servers
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mathjax] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mathjax 2.7.1-1
An open source JavaScript display engine for mathematics that works in all modern browsers
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software JavaScript display engine for mathematics that works in all modern browsers
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mediaproxy] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mediaproxy 2.6.1-2
Open-source media proxy for OpenSER
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software media proxy for OpenSER
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [metasploit] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/metasploit 4.13.22-1
Advanced open-source platform for developing, testing, and using exploit code
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Advanced free-software platform for developing, testing, and using exploit code
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mixxx] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mixxx 2.0.0-8
Free, open source software for digital DJ'ing.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software for digital DJ'ing.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mongodb] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mongodb 3.4.3-1
A high-performance, open source, schema-free document-oriented database
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A high-performance, free software, schema-free document-oriented database
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mosquitto] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/mosquitto 1.4.11-5
An Open Source MQTT v3.1/v3.1.1 Broker
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software MQTT v3.1/v3.1.1 Broker
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [obs-studio] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/obs-studio 18.0.2-1
Free, open source software for live streaming and recording
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software for live streaming and recording
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [ode] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/ode 0.14-1
An open source, high performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, high performance library for simulating rigid body dynamics
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opendkim] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/opendkim 2.10.3-4
An open source implementation of the DKIM sender authentication system. Based on a fork of dkim-milter.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of the DKIM sender authentication system. Based on a fork of dkim-milter.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opendmarc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/opendmarc 1.3.2-1
Free open source software implementation of the DMARC specification
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of the DMARC specification
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openra] vague terminology "Open Source" in description... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/openra 20170421-1
An open-source implementation of the Red Alert engine using .NET/Mono and OpenGL
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software implementation of the Red Alert engine using .NET/Mono and OpenGL
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openscenegraph] vague terminology "Open Source" in des... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/openscenegraph 3.4.0-5
An Open Source, high performance real-time graphics toolkit
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software, high performance real-time graphics toolkit
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opensips] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/opensips 2.2.3-1
An Open Source SIP Server able to act as a SIP proxy, registrar, location server, redirect server ...
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software SIP Server able to act as a SIP proxy, registrar, location server, redirect server ...
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opensubdiv] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/opensubdiv 3.1.1-1 [installed]
An Open-Source subdivision surface library
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software subdivision surface library
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [pdfsam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/pdfsam 3.3.0-1
A free open source tool to split and merge pdf documents
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software tool to split and merge pdf documents
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [pokerth] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/pokerth 1.1.1-17
Open source Texas Hold'em Poker simulator
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software Texas Hold'em Poker simulator
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [polymake] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/polymake 3.1-1
Open source software for research in polyhedral geometry
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software for research in polyhedral geometry
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [portaudio] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/portaudio 190600_20161030-1
A free, cross-platform, open source, audio I/O library.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, cross-platform, audio I/O library.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [pymol] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/pymol 1.8.6.0-2
Molecular visualization system on an Open Source foundation
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Molecular visualization system on a Free Software foundation
|