All Projects

Hello,

Could it be possible to add this package :

powerpill

“Pacman wrapper for faster downloads.”

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/powerpill/

https://xyne.archlinux.ca/projects/powerpill

License : GPL

Thanks

The Knock patches for linux-libre maintained by you at https://git.hyperbola.info:50100/kernels/knock.git/ have support up to linux-libre 4.13 only (and I think it didn’t work for it when I tried it, compilation failed) but from all of those supported versions, the newest maintained generation by the upstream is 4.9.x

However, since newer kernel generations might require reprogramming the patch, I want to request it only for the latest LTS generation which is 4.14. As you know, LTS software are supported for a long time, so it’s worth to make it for linux-libre 4.14.x

This might not be really important for Hyperbola in the short term, but you are the maintainers of the TCP Stealth implementation for Linux-libre and I and maybe other people would like to use it in their projects for newer versions.

Plus, it would be great since while 4.9 kernels can use the GRSec+Knock combination like linux-libre-lts-unofficial-grsec-knock, with support for 4.14 anyone would be able to use a combination of newer patches such as Linux-hardened+Knock (Linux-hardened supports 4.14 and 4.15 as of now) which is what I’d like to do.
https://github.com/copperhead/linux-hardened/releases

Hello,

Could it be possible to add this package :

flacon

“Extracts individual tracks from one big audio file containing the entire album of music and saves them as separate audio files.”

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/flacon/

https://flacon.github.io/

License : LGPL2.1

Thanks

Hi guys, I have ever run into a Brother brand printer model DCPT500W[0], and I have seen that the source code for the drivers under GPLv3 license is available.

I also see that there is a file brother_dcpt500w_printer_en.ppd, which is important for cups, which is why it may be necessary to integrate it into the cups, as long as the drivers are Libre.

[0]:https://download.brother.com/welcome/dlf101963/dcpt500w_cupswrapper_GPL_source_3.0.2-0.tar.gz

Hello,

Could it be possible to add this package :

arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc

“The GNU Compiler Collection (arm-linux-gnueabihf)”

Also requires :

arm-linux-gnueabihf-binutils (A set of programs to assemble and manipulate binary and object files)
arm-linux-gnueabihf-glibc (GNU C Library)

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc/

License : GPL

Thanks

Hello,

It would be great to add this package :

gogs

“Self Hosted Git Service written in Go”

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gogs

openrc init scripts : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gogs-openrc

License : GPL

Thanks

Hi,

Would be nice to add etherpad-lite to our pacman.

https://github.com/ether/etherpad-lite

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/etherpad-lite/

Hello,

Could it be possible to add this package :

gimagereader

“A graphical frontend to tesseract-ocr”

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimagereader

License : GPL3

Thanks

New versión v2.2.7

References:

• https://github.com/apple/cups/releases/tag/v2.2.7
• https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/cups
• https://debian.simnet.is/debian/pool/main/c/cups/cups_2.2.7-3.debian.tar.xz

this package is under gpl3. It is the most reasonable chess game because it can be easy or hard depending on your preference.

texmacs 
ERROR: Unbound variable: eval-when

it cannot start

admin→ gimp IMG_20170909_153350828.jpg
GEGL-Message: Module ‘/usr/lib/gegl-0.3/lens-correct.so’ load error: liblensfun.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
GEGL-Message: Module ‘/usr/lib/gegl-0.3/matting-levin.so’ load error: libumfpack.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

(gimp:12519): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: g_object_set_valist: object class ‘GeglConfig’ has no property named ‘cache-size’

Those are errors I get when running Gimp.

admin-> sudo pacman -R texlive-most
checking dependencies...
:: ghostscript optionally requires texlive-core: needed for dvipdf
:: inkscape optionally requires texlive-core: latex formulas

Packages (15) texlive-bibtexextra-2016.43765-1  texlive-core-2016.43757-1.hyperbola2  texlive-fontsextra-2016.43763-1.hyperbola2  texlive-formatsextra-2016.41438-3  texlive-games-2016.43415-1
              texlive-genericextra-2016.43605-1  texlive-htmlxml-2016.43769-1  texlive-humanities-2016.43711-1  texlive-latexextra-2016.43768-1.hyperbola2  texlive-music-2016.43375-1
              texlive-pictures-2016.43767-1  texlive-plainextra-2016.43137-1  texlive-pstricks-2016.43710-1  texlive-publishers-2016.43764-1  texlive-science-2016.43747-1

Total Removed Size:  1300.90 MiB

:: Do you want to remove these packages? [Y/n] y
:: Processing package changes...
( 1/15) removing texlive-science                                                                                     [######################################################################] 100%
( 2/15) removing texlive-publishers                                                                                  [######################################################################] 100%
( 3/15) removing texlive-pstricks                                                                                    [######################################################################] 100%
( 4/15) removing texlive-plainextra                                                                                  [######################################################################] 100%
( 5/15) removing texlive-pictures                                                                                    [######################################################################] 100%
( 6/15) removing texlive-music                                                                                       [######################################################################] 100%
( 7/15) removing texlive-humanities                                                                                  [######################################################################] 100%
( 8/15) removing texlive-latexextra                                                                                  [######################################################################] 100%
( 9/15) removing texlive-htmlxml                                                                                     [######################################################################] 100%
(10/15) removing texlive-genericextra                                                                                [######################################################################] 100%
(11/15) removing texlive-games                                                                                       [######################################################################] 100%
(12/15) removing texlive-formatsextra                                                                                [######################################################################] 100%
(13/15) removing texlive-fontsextra                                                                                  [######################################################################] 100%
(14/15) removing texlive-bibtexextra                                                                                 [######################################################################] 100%
(15/15) removing texlive-core                                                                                        [######################################################################] 100%
warning: /etc/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf saved as /etc/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf.pacsave
:: Running post-transaction hooks...
(1/3) Updating TeXLive filename database...
warning: kpathsea: configuration file texmf.cnf not found in these directories: /usr/bin:/usr/bin/share/texmf-local/web2c:/usr/bin/share/texmf-dist/web2c:/usr/bin/share/texmf/web2c:/usr/bin/texmf-local/web2c:/usr/bin/texmf-dist/web2c:/usr/bin/texmf/web2c:/usr:/usr/share/texmf-local/web2c:/usr/share/texmf-dist/web2c:/usr/share/texmf/web2c:/usr/texmf-local/web2c:/usr/texmf-dist/web2c:/usr/texmf/web2c://texmf-local/web2c:/://share/texmf-local/web2c://share/texmf-dist/web2c://share/texmf/web2c://texmf-local/web2c://texmf-dist/web2c://texmf/web2c.
/usr/share/libalpm/scripts/mktexlsr: line 4: /usr/bin/mtxrun: No such file or directory
(2/3) Updating TeXLive format files...
cp: cannot stat 'usr/share/texmf-dist/web2c/fmtutil-hdr.cnf': No such file or directory
cat: 'var/lib/texmf/arch/installedpkgs/*.fmts': No such file or directory
/usr/share/libalpm/scripts/texlive-fmtutil: line 18: /usr/bin/fmtutil-sys: No such file or directory
error: command failed to execute correctly
(3/3) Updating TeXLive font maps...
cp: cannot stat 'usr/share/texmf-dist/web2c/updmap-hdr.cfg': No such file or directory
cat: 'var/lib/texmf/arch/installedpkgs/*.maps': No such file or directory
/usr/share/libalpm/scripts/texlive-updmap: line 12: /usr/bin/updmap-sys: No such file or directory
error: command failed to execute correctly
[~]

community/wireshark-cli 2.2.6-1
    a free network protocol analyzer for Unix/Linux and Windows - CLI version
community/wireshark-common 2.2.6-1
    Common files used by wireshark-gtk and wireshark-qt
community/wireshark-gtk 2.2.6-1
    a free network protocol analyzer for Unix/Linux and Windows - GTK frontend
community/wireshark-qt 2.2.6-1
    a free network protocol analyzer for Unix/Linux and Windows - Qt frontend

It’s better to change to a more neutral description such as “a cross-platform network protocol analyzer - CLI/GTK/Qt version”.

community/keepass 2.35-2
    A easy-to-use password manager for Windows, Linux, Mac OS X and mobile
    devices.

Better to change to something like “A cross-platform password manager supporting mobile devices”.

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/aiksaurus 1.2.1-5
    A cross-platform, open-source thesaurus

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A cross-platform, free-software thesaurus

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/assimp 3.3.1-1
    Portable Open Source library to import various well-known 3D model formats in an uniform manner

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Portable Free Software library to import various well-known 3D model formats in an uniform manner

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/cmake 3.8.0-1
    A cross-platform open-source make system

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A cross-platform free-software make system

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/gstreamer 1.12.0-1
    GStreamer open-source multimedia framework core library

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

GStreamer free-software multimedia framework core library

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/java-openjfx 8.u121-1
    Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX)

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX)

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/java-openjfx-doc 8.u121-1
    Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - documentation

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - documentation

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/java-openjfx-src 8.u121-1
    Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - sources

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - sources

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/kdegames-kigo 17.04.0-1 (kde-applications kdegames)
    An open-source implementation of the popular Go game

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free-software implementation of the popular Go game

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/libgdiplus 4.2-1
    An Open Source Implementation of the GDI+ API

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A Free Software Implementation of the GDI+ API

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/libical 2.0.0-2
    An open source reference implementation of the icalendar data type and serialization format

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software reference implementation of the icalendar data type and serialization format

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/liblouis 3.0.0-2
    Open-source braille translator and back-translator

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free-software braille translator and back-translator

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/libofa 0.9.3-6
    An open-source audio fingerprint by MusicIP

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free-software audio fingerprint by MusicIP

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/libomxil-bellagio 0.9.3-1
    An opensource implementation of the OpenMAX Integration Layer API

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software implementation of the OpenMAX Integration Layer API

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/libupnp 1.6.21-1
    Portable Open Source UPnP Development Kit

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Portable Free Software UPnP Development Kit

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/mlt 6.4.1-6
    An open source multimedia framework

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software multimedia framework

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/mlt-python-bindings 6.4.1-6
    An open source multimedia framework

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software multimedia framework

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
    Open source implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
    Free software implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/openjpeg 1.5.2-1
    An open source JPEG 2000 codec

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software JPEG 2000 codec

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/openjpeg2 2.1.2-2
    An open source JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/sofia-sip 1.12.11-3
    An open-source SIP User-Agent library

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free-software SIP User-Agent library

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/swt 4.6.2-3
    An open source widget toolkit for Java

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software widget toolkit for Java

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/tomcat7 7.0.76-1
    Open source implementation of the Java Servlet 3.0 and JavaServer Pages 2.2 technologies

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software implementation of the Java Servlet 3.0 and JavaServer Pages 2.2 technologies

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/tomcat8 8.0.42-1
    Open source implementation of the Java Servlet 3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 technologies

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software implementation of the Java Servlet 3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 technologies

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/unixodbc 2.3.4-2
    ODBC is an open specification for providing application developers with a predictable API with which to access Data Sources

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

ODBC is a free specification for providing application developers with a predictable API with which to access Data Sources

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/wildmidi 0.4.0-1
    Open Source MIDI Synthesizer

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free Software MIDI Synthesizer

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/x265 2.4-1
    Open Source H265/HEVC video encoder

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free Software H265/HEVC video encoder

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/xapian-core 1:1.4.2-1
    Open source search engine library.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software search engine library.

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/xsd 4.0.0-2
    An open-source, cross-platform W3C XML Schema to C++ data binding compiler

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free-software, cross-platform W3C XML Schema to C++ data binding compiler

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/xvidcore 1.3.4-1 [installed]
    XviD is an open source MPEG-4 video codec

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

XviD is a free software MPEG-4 video codec

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/beignet 1.3.1-2
    An open source OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/bzrtp 1.0.5-1
    Opensource implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/cimg 1.7.1-1
    Open-source C++ toolkit for image processing

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free-software C++ toolkit for image processing

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/displaycal 3.2.4.0-1
    Open Source Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free Software Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/dokuwiki 20170219_b-1
    Simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Simple to use and highly versatile free wiki software

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/dsdp 5.8-1
    A free open source implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming