|
Packages | Stable | Freedom Issue | Very Low | Medium | [xfe] Replace with Hyperbola Iceweasel-UXP for HTML and... | Unconfirmed | |
Task Description
Two formats (including HTML and PHP) are provided to run semi-libre/free web browser Mozilla Firefox in the original code base, but it currently got blacklisted due to numerous branding, security and privacy issues, and replaced by the Hyperbola Iceweasel-UXP. To replace existing strings at the web section in xferc.in:
html = "iceweasel-uxp,iceweasel-uxp,<txteditor>;Hyper Text;html_32x32.png;html_16x16.png;;"
htm = "iceweasel-uxp,iceweasel-uxp,<txteditor>;Hyper Text;html_32x32.png;html_16x16.png;;"
php = "iceweasel-uxp,iceweasel-uxp,<txteditor>;PHP Source;html_32x32.png;html_16x16.png;;"
|
|
Packages | Stable | Implementation Request | Very Low | Medium | [gcc] Renew to version 8 or 9, including multilib | Deferred | |
Task Description
As even the support for GCC 7 is now ending with the release of version 7.5 (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2019-11/msg00099.html) I’d like to propose a renewal of the building-stack - which I think is also needed in time. Also a renewal of the glibc would be good at all!
|
|
Packages | Any | Security Issue | Very Low | Medium | Download debian-fixes instead of relying on external so... | Unconfirmed | |
Task Description
It happened already with minetest and again with prosody: When trying to build own packages with makepkg there are patches downloaded from the Debian-project. But the given HTTP(S)-sources are no longer available, concrete example within prosody to be found: https://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/p/prosody/prosody_0.10.2-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz (not available)
Please don’t rely on those external sources when creating PKGBUILD-files or just give users the possibility for a secure and granted download. Therefore I cannot build prosody on my own now!
|
|
Packages | Stable | Bug Report | Very Low | Medium | linphonec error (cli version) | Unconfirmed | |
Task Description
Description:
linphonec is unusable because a error produce a continuous log
Additional info:
linphone 3.11.1-1.hyperbola1
Steps to reproduce:
linphonec
Log:
linphonec> 2019-12-15 19:25:58:010 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:03:012 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:08:018 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:13:013 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:18:016 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:23:014 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:28:010 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:33:010 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:38:012 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:43:015 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:48:010 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
2019-12-15 19:26:53:010 ortp-error-Error in connect: Network is unreachable
|
|
Services | HyperWeb | Bug Report | Very Low | Medium | The Mailling list don't work | Unconfirmed | |
Task Description
The Mailling list don't work : https://lists.hyperbola.info//mailman/listinfo/
|
|
Packages | Any | Implementation Request | Very Low | Medium | [chdkptp] please add package to control Canon cameras | Unconfirmed | |
Task Description
CHDKPTP is part of CHDK project - a free software firmware add-on for Canon cameras. It enables controlling Canon cameras via the computer.
Attached is a modified iup PKGBUILD (Lua 5.3 build was removed as it failed to compile) and configuration files for chdkptp.
Code is available via svn:
$ svn co http://subversion.assembla.com/svn/chdkptp/trunk chdkptp
Copy chdkptp.sh and config.mk files to source tree then compile via make. chdkptp requires root privileges to connect to a camera.
|
|
Packages | Stable | Security Issue | Very Low | Medium | [git] Multiple CVEs | Unconfirmed | |
Task Description
CVE-2020-5260 has been fixed very recently in Debian, so I thought I would apply this patch. However, I found out that security patches have not been applied for quite a while (I could account for at least 6 CVEs).
Considering that the version in Debian stretch (2.11.0) is the nearest version with security patches released by Debian and that git project oldest supported version is 2.17, I have used patches from Debian stretch to apply on 2.12.2 currently in Milky Way.
But I have the following error on check():
| *** prove ***
|
| Test Summary Report
| -------------------
| t5570-git-daemon.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 20 Failed: 10)
| Failed tests: 3-7, 15-19
| Non-zero exit status: 1
| t5811-proto-disable-git.sh (Wstat: 256 Tests: 26 Failed: 16)
| Failed tests: 2-6, 9-11, 15-19, 21-23
| Non-zero exit status: 1
| Files=769, Tests=14137, 1101 wallclock secs ( 8.08 usr 1.12 sys + 144.48 cusr 63.42 csys = 217.10 CPU)
| Result: FAIL
| make[1]: *** [Makefile:45: prove] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/git/src/git-2.12.2/t'
| make: *** [Makefile:2291: test] Error 2
| ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in check().
| Aborting...
This does not seem to be related to my change as the current version in Milky Way produces the same error (IOW the package currently in Milky Way is not rebuidable).
|
|
Packages | Any | Feature Request | Defer | Medium | [aqemu] libertybsd is missing from installation list | Deferred | |
Task Description
aqemu only lists GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd. Since LibertyBSD is also free it should also be added.
|
|
Packages | Any | Feature Request | Medium | Low | [cinnamon] add elogind support | Researching | |
Task Description
Cinnamon currently does not support elogind, and depends on systemd. A patch is needed to fix this issue.
|
|
Packages | Any | Implementation Request | Medium | Low | Scid vs. PC – PGN Reader/ChessBase | Unconfirmed | |
Task Description
http://scidvspc.sourceforge.net/
|
|
Packages | Any | Implementation Request | Medium | Low | Stockfish Chess Engine | Unconfirmed | |
Task Description
«Unlike most chess engines, Stockfish is open source (GPL license). That means you can read the code, modify it, contribute back, and even use it in your own projects.» I do not know if it is libre. If it is, together with Scid, Hyperbola is one step closer for every chess lover out there who also loves freedom!
https://stockfishchess.org/
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [aiksaurus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/aiksaurus 1.2.1-5
A cross-platform, open-source thesaurus
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A cross-platform, free-software thesaurus
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [assimp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/assimp 3.3.1-1
Portable Open Source library to import various well-known 3D model formats in an uniform manner
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Portable Free Software library to import various well-known 3D model formats in an uniform manner
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [cmake] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/cmake 3.8.0-1
A cross-platform open-source make system
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A cross-platform free-software make system
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gstreamer] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/gstreamer 1.12.0-1
GStreamer open-source multimedia framework core library
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
GStreamer free-software multimedia framework core library
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-openjfx] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-openjfx 8.u121-1
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX)
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-openjfx-doc] vague terminology "Open Source" in d... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-openjfx-doc 8.u121-1
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - documentation
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - documentation
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-openjfx-src] vague terminology "Open Source" in d... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-openjfx-src 8.u121-1
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - sources
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - sources
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [kdegames-kigo] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/kdegames-kigo 17.04.0-1 (kde-applications kdegames)
An open-source implementation of the popular Go game
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software implementation of the popular Go game
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libgdiplus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libgdiplus 4.2-1
An Open Source Implementation of the GDI+ API
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software Implementation of the GDI+ API
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libical] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libical 2.0.0-2
An open source reference implementation of the icalendar data type and serialization format
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software reference implementation of the icalendar data type and serialization format
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [liblouis] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/liblouis 3.0.0-2
Open-source braille translator and back-translator
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software braille translator and back-translator
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libofa] vague terminology "Open Source" in description... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libofa 0.9.3-6
An open-source audio fingerprint by MusicIP
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software audio fingerprint by MusicIP
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libomxil-bellagio] vague terminology "Open Source" in ... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libomxil-bellagio 0.9.3-1
An opensource implementation of the OpenMAX Integration Layer API
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of the OpenMAX Integration Layer API
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libupnp] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libupnp 1.6.21-1
Portable Open Source UPnP Development Kit
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Portable Free Software UPnP Development Kit
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mlt] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/mlt 6.4.1-6
An open source multimedia framework
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software multimedia framework
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mlt-python-bindings] vague terminology "Open Source" i... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/mlt-python-bindings 6.4.1-6
An open source multimedia framework
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software multimedia framework
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opencore-amr] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
Open source implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
Free software implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjpeg] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Unconfirmed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/openjpeg 1.5.2-1
An open source JPEG 2000 codec
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software JPEG 2000 codec
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjpeg2] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/openjpeg2 2.1.2-2
An open source JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [sofia-sip] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/sofia-sip 1.12.11-3
An open-source SIP User-Agent library
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software SIP User-Agent library
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [swt] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/swt 4.6.2-3
An open source widget toolkit for Java
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software widget toolkit for Java
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [tomcat7] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/tomcat7 7.0.76-1
Open source implementation of the Java Servlet 3.0 and JavaServer Pages 2.2 technologies
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of the Java Servlet 3.0 and JavaServer Pages 2.2 technologies
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [tomcat8] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/tomcat8 8.0.42-1
Open source implementation of the Java Servlet 3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 technologies
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of the Java Servlet 3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 technologies
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [unixodbc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/unixodbc 2.3.4-2
ODBC is an open specification for providing application developers with a predictable API with which to access Data Sources
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
ODBC is a free specification for providing application developers with a predictable API with which to access Data Sources
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [wildmidi] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/wildmidi 0.4.0-1
Open Source MIDI Synthesizer
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free Software MIDI Synthesizer
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [x265] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/x265 2.4-1
Open Source H265/HEVC video encoder
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free Software H265/HEVC video encoder
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xapian-core] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/xapian-core 1:1.4.2-1
Open source search engine library.
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software search engine library.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xsd] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/xsd 4.0.0-2
An open-source, cross-platform W3C XML Schema to C++ data binding compiler
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software, cross-platform W3C XML Schema to C++ data binding compiler
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xvidcore] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/xvidcore 1.3.4-1 [installed]
XviD is an open source MPEG-4 video codec
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
XviD is a free software MPEG-4 video codec
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [beignet] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/beignet 1.3.1-2
An open source OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [bzrtp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/bzrtp 1.0.5-1
Opensource implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [cimg] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/cimg 1.7.1-1
Open-source C++ toolkit for image processing
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software C++ toolkit for image processing
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [displaycal] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/displaycal 3.2.4.0-1
Open Source Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free Software Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dokuwiki] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dokuwiki 20170219_b-1
Simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Simple to use and highly versatile free wiki software
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dsdp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dsdp 5.8-1
A free open source implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dspam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dspam 3.10.2-14
A scalable, open-source statistical anti-spam filter
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A scalable, free-software statistical anti-spam filter
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [fcitx-mozc] vague terminology "Open Source" and "Linux... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source” and “Linux”:
community/fcitx-mozc 2.20.2673.102-2
Fcitx Module of A Japanese Input Method for Chromium OS, Windows, Mac and Linux (the Open Source Edition of Google Japanese Input)
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source” and “Linux” as operating system, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source” and “Linux” as operating system. Also it should avoid contains nonfree OSs in its description.
eg.
Fcitx Module of A Japanese Input Method for GNU/Linux (the Free Software Edition of Google Japanese Input)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/flightgear 2017.1.3-1
An open-source, multi-platform flight simulator
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software, multi-platform flight simulator
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear-data] vague terminology "Open Source" in de... | Deferred | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/flightgear-data 2017.1.3-1
Base-Data for the opensource flight-simulator.
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Base-Data for the free-software flight-simulator.
|
