|
Software Development | HyperBK | Implementation Request | Very High | Critical | Develop a BSD descendant kernel for HyperbolaBSD | In Progress | |
Task Description
Develop HyperBK (Hyper Berkeley Kernel), a BSD descendant kernel with GPL-compatible licenses preserved, non-compatible ones removed, and new code written under GPL-3 for HyperbolaBSD.
TODO:
Download OpenBSD kernel source code from OpenBSD site → DONE
Download LibertyBSD scripts to deblob and rebrand kernel from their scripts. → DONE
Remove files under non GPL-compatible licenses → DONE
Import code from another BSD systems under GPL-compatible licenses → IN PROGRESS
Write new code under GPL-3 → IN PROGRESS
PATCHING NOTE
When the check concerns kernel, we obviously want to match with HyperbolaBSD.
Example of triplet check: hyperbolabsd)
Example of uname -s check: HyperbolaBSD)
Example of uname -r check: 0.1)
Example of C macro check: defined(__HyperbolaBSD__)
|
|
Services | HyperWeb Issue | Bug Report | Very Low | Low | RSS needs fixing | Unconfirmed | |
Task Description
Seems deleted items reappearing in the Hyperbola feeds since it gives its feed items empty ID string.
|
|
Software Development | General | Implementation Request | Defer | Critical | RISC-V (riscv64) porting + multilib support | Closed | |
Task Description
The unfortunate reality is that x86 computers come encumbered with built-in low-level backdoors like the Intel Management Engine , as well as nonfree boot firmware. This means that users can’t gain full control over their computers, even if they install a free operating system such as Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre .
Hyperbola is working hard to fix these issues and getting closer every day, but for the time being, this is why many current Respects Your Freedom (RYF) offerings are refurbished older devices.
For the future of free computing, we need support architectures that do not come with such malware pre-installed, and RISC-V promises to be a great architecture example for low-power computers, laptops and embedded systems, also as ARM architecture replacement.
Devices like this are the future of computing that Respects Your Freedom and for that reason it’s a high priority for Hyperbola port all packages for the RISC-V architecture (riscv64) with multilib support.
NOTE: RISC-V porting is focused only for Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre .
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [aiksaurus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/aiksaurus 1.2.1-5
A cross-platform, open-source thesaurus
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A cross-platform, free-software thesaurus
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [assimp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/assimp 3.3.1-1
Portable Open Source library to import various well-known 3D model formats in an uniform manner
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Portable Free Software library to import various well-known 3D model formats in an uniform manner
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [cmake] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/cmake 3.8.0-1
A cross-platform open-source make system
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A cross-platform free-software make system
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gstreamer] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/gstreamer 1.12.0-1
GStreamer open-source multimedia framework core library
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
GStreamer free-software multimedia framework core library
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-openjfx] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-openjfx 8.u121-1
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX)
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-openjfx-doc] vague terminology "Open Source" in d ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-openjfx-doc 8.u121-1
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - documentation
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - documentation
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-openjfx-src] vague terminology "Open Source" in d ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-openjfx-src 8.u121-1
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - sources
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - sources
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [kdegames-kigo] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/kdegames-kigo 17.04.0-1 (kde-applications kdegames)
An open-source implementation of the popular Go game
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software implementation of the popular Go game
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libgdiplus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libgdiplus 4.2-1
An Open Source Implementation of the GDI+ API
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software Implementation of the GDI+ API
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libical] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libical 2.0.0-2
An open source reference implementation of the icalendar data type and serialization format
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software reference implementation of the icalendar data type and serialization format
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [liblouis] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/liblouis 3.0.0-2
Open-source braille translator and back-translator
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software braille translator and back-translator
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libofa] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libofa 0.9.3-6
An open-source audio fingerprint by MusicIP
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software audio fingerprint by MusicIP
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libomxil-bellagio] vague terminology "Open Source" in ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libomxil-bellagio 0.9.3-1
An opensource implementation of the OpenMAX Integration Layer API
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of the OpenMAX Integration Layer API
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libupnp] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libupnp 1.6.21-1
Portable Open Source UPnP Development Kit
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Portable Free Software UPnP Development Kit
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mlt] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/mlt 6.4.1-6
An open source multimedia framework
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software multimedia framework
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mlt-python-bindings] vague terminology "Open Source" i ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/mlt-python-bindings 6.4.1-6
An open source multimedia framework
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software multimedia framework
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opencore-amr] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
Open source implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
Free software implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjpeg2] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/openjpeg2 2.1.2-2
An open source JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [sofia-sip] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/sofia-sip 1.12.11-3
An open-source SIP User-Agent library
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software SIP User-Agent library
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [swt] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/swt 4.6.2-3
An open source widget toolkit for Java
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software widget toolkit for Java
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [tomcat7] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/tomcat7 7.0.76-1
Open source implementation of the Java Servlet 3.0 and JavaServer Pages 2.2 technologies
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of the Java Servlet 3.0 and JavaServer Pages 2.2 technologies
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [tomcat8] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/tomcat8 8.0.42-1
Open source implementation of the Java Servlet 3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 technologies
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of the Java Servlet 3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 technologies
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [unixodbc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [wildmidi] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [x265] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xapian-core] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xsd] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xvidcore] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [beignet] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [bzrtp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [cimg] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [displaycal] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dokuwiki] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dsdp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dspam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [fcitx-mozc] vague terminology "Open Source" and "Linux ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear-data] vague terminology "Open Source" in de ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freehdl] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freevo] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gerbv] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-wayland] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-x11] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [goaccess] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gocr] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [hyperion] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [inn] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
