All Projects

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/java-rhino 1.7.7.1-1.hyperbola1
    Open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java - JAR

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free-software implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java - JAR

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/java-openjfx 8.u121-1
    Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX)

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX)

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/java-openjfx-src 8.u121-1
    Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - sources

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - sources

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/java-openjfx-doc 8.u121-1
    Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - documentation

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - documentation

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/irrlicht 1.8.4-1
    An open source high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/irrlicht-docs 1.8.4-1
    An open source high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/inn 2.6.1-1
    Complete open source Usenet system. De facto standard for handling news routing, news spool and serving the spool to customers.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Complete free software Usenet system. De facto standard for handling news routing, news spool and serving the spool to customers.

Description:
There is a strange bug (white rectangle) in the FindBar when a phrase isn’t found.

Additional info:
* package version(s): 52.9.0_20180601-3

Steps to reproduce:
Go to Edit > Find

Then put a phrase in the FindBar to search it in any page, if it isn’t found, appears a strange “white rectangle” covering the phrase.

Description:
“About Iceweasel-UXP” window contains some minor issues to be fixed:

• “Iceweasel-UXP” instead of “Iceweasel” because we are a different project.
• “Hyperbola Project” instead of “the Hyperbola Project” as link to point to Hyperbola site.
• “for Iceweasel-UXP application” instead of “for Iceweasel rebranding” because we are maintaining an entire application, not just rebranding.

Additional info:
* package version(s): 52.9.0_20180601-3

Steps to reproduce:
Go to Help > About Iceweasel-UXP

Description:
There’s a XML parsing error in Iceweasel-UXP when it’s accessing in a feed subscription.

Additional info:
* package version(s): 52.9.0_20180601-7
* config and/or log files etc:

XML Parsing Error: undefined entity Location: jar:file:///usr/lib/iceweasel-uxp/browser/omni.ja!/chrome/browser/content/browser/feeds/subscribe.xhtml Line Number 25, Column 12:
    <title>&feedPage.title;</title>
-----------^

Steps to reproduce:

• Install Iceweasel-UXP:

  # pacman -S iceweasel-uxp

• Run Iceweasel-UXP:

  ~ iceweasel-uxp

• Enter to Hyperbola RSS Feeds page and then subscribe in one of feeds available.

Description:
There’s a XML parsing error in Iceweasel-UXP when it’s accessing a non-existent site or about:help

Additional info:
* package version(s): 52.9.0_20180601-7
* config and/or log files etc:

XML Parsing Error: undefined entity Location: jar:file:///usr/lib/iceweasel-uxp/browser/omni.ja!/chrome/browser/content/browser/aboutNetError.xhtml Line Number 22, Column 12:
    <title>&loadError.label;</title>
-----------^

Steps to reproduce:

• Install Iceweasel-UXP:

  # pacman -S iceweasel-uxp

• Run Iceweasel-UXP:

  ~ iceweasel-uxp

• Type about:help or a non-existent site in the address bar

Description:
Add Brazilian Portuguese hyphenation to hunspell.

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/hyperion 1.03.2-9
    An opensource 'AmbiLight' implementation

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software 'AmbiLight' implementation

Description:
Add Brazilian Portuguese grammar, spelling and hyphenation checker to hunspell.

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/gstreamer 1.12.0-1
    GStreamer open-source multimedia framework core library

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

GStreamer free-software multimedia framework core library

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/gocr 0.50-2
    Open-source character recognition (OCR)

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free-software character recognition (OCR)

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/goaccess 1.2-1
    An open source real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer

This package contains vague terminology “MP3 Player”:

community/gmtp 1.3.10-2
    A simple MP3 player client for MTP based devices

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “MP3 Player”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#MP3Player

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “MP3 Player”.

eg.

A simple audio player client for MTP based devices

This package contains vague terminology “Vendor”:

community/glide 0.12.3-1
    Dependency management and vendoring for Go projects

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Vendor”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Vendor

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Vendor”.

eg.

Dependency management and suppliering for Go projects

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/glfw-x11 3.2.1-1
    A free, open source, portable framework for graphical application development (x11)

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software, portable framework for graphical application development (x11)

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/glfw-wayland 3.2.1-1
    A free, open source, portable framework for graphical application development (wayland)

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software, portable framework for graphical application development (wayland)

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/gerbv 2.6.1-4
    An open source Gerber file (RS-274X only) viewer

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software Gerber file (RS-274X only) viewer

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/freevo 1.9.0-14
    An open-source home theatre PC platform

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free-software home theatre PC platform

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/freehdl 0.0.8-8
    An open-source (C++ generating) VHDL simulator

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free-software (C++ generating) VHDL simulator

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/flightgear 2017.1.3-1
    An open-source, multi-platform flight simulator

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free-software, multi-platform flight simulator