|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Very High | Critical | [warsow] contains Steam support | Closed | |
Task Description
Warsow contains a library called steamlib which is built from the source. It’s useful only for Steam support which is nonfree software.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openssl] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
core/openssl 1.1.0.e-1
The Open Source toolkit for Secure Sockets Layer and Transport Layer Security
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
The Free Software toolkit for Secure Sockets Layer and Transport Layer Security
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [aiksaurus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/aiksaurus 1.2.1-5
A cross-platform, open-source thesaurus
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A cross-platform, free-software thesaurus
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [assimp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/assimp 3.3.1-1
Portable Open Source library to import various well-known 3D model formats in an uniform manner
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Portable Free Software library to import various well-known 3D model formats in an uniform manner
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [cmake] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/cmake 3.8.0-1
A cross-platform open-source make system
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A cross-platform free-software make system
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gstreamer] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/gstreamer 1.12.0-1
GStreamer open-source multimedia framework core library
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
GStreamer free-software multimedia framework core library
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-openjfx] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-openjfx 8.u121-1
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX)
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-openjfx-doc] vague terminology "Open Source" in d ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-openjfx-doc 8.u121-1
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - documentation
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - documentation
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-openjfx-src] vague terminology "Open Source" in d ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-openjfx-src 8.u121-1
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - sources
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - sources
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-rhino] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-rhino 1.7.7.1-1.hyperbola1
Open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java - JAR
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java - JAR
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [kdegames-kigo] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/kdegames-kigo 17.04.0-1 (kde-applications kdegames)
An open-source implementation of the popular Go game
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software implementation of the popular Go game
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libgdiplus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libgdiplus 4.2-1
An Open Source Implementation of the GDI+ API
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software Implementation of the GDI+ API
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libical] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libical 2.0.0-2
An open source reference implementation of the icalendar data type and serialization format
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software reference implementation of the icalendar data type and serialization format
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [liblouis] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/liblouis 3.0.0-2
Open-source braille translator and back-translator
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software braille translator and back-translator
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libofa] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libofa 0.9.3-6
An open-source audio fingerprint by MusicIP
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software audio fingerprint by MusicIP
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libomxil-bellagio] vague terminology "Open Source" in ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libomxil-bellagio 0.9.3-1
An opensource implementation of the OpenMAX Integration Layer API
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of the OpenMAX Integration Layer API
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libupnp] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libupnp 1.6.21-1
Portable Open Source UPnP Development Kit
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Portable Free Software UPnP Development Kit
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mlt] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/mlt 6.4.1-6
An open source multimedia framework
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software multimedia framework
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mlt-python-bindings] vague terminology "Open Source" i ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/mlt-python-bindings 6.4.1-6
An open source multimedia framework
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software multimedia framework
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opencore-amr] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
Open source implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
Free software implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjdk7-src] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
no task description |
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjdk8-src] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
no task description |
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjpeg] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/openjpeg 1.5.2-1
An open source JPEG 2000 codec
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software JPEG 2000 codec
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjpeg2] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/openjpeg2 2.1.2-2
An open source JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openslp] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/openslp 2.0.0-2.hyperbola1
Open-source implementation of Service Location Protocol, with OpenRC support
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software implementation of Service Location Protocol, with OpenRC support
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openssl-1.0] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [rhino] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [rhino-javadoc] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [sofia-sip] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [swt] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [tomcat7] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [tomcat8] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [unixodbc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [wildmidi] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [x265] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xapian-core] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xsd] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xvidcore] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [adobe-source-han-sans-cn-fonts] vague terminology "Ope ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [adobe-source-han-sans-jp-fonts] vague terminology "Ope ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [adobe-source-han-sans-kr-fonts] vague terminology "Ope ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [adobe-source-han-sans-otc-fonts] vague terminology "Op ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [adobe-source-han-sans-tw-fonts] vague terminology "Ope ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [adobe-source-han-serif-cn-fonts] vague terminology "Op ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [adobe-source-han-serif-jp-fonts] vague terminology "Op ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [adobe-source-han-serif-kr-fonts] vague terminology "Op ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [adobe-source-han-serif-otc-fonts] vague terminology "O ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [adobe-source-han-serif-tw-fonts] vague terminology "Op ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [beignet] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [bzrtp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
