|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [bzrtp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/bzrtp 1.0.5-1
Opensource implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [cimg] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/cimg 1.7.1-1
Open-source C++ toolkit for image processing
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software C++ toolkit for image processing
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [displaycal] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/displaycal 3.2.4.0-1
Open Source Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free Software Display Calibration and Characterization powered by Argyll CMS (Formerly known as dispcalGUI)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dokuwiki] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dokuwiki 20170219_b-1
Simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Simple to use and highly versatile free wiki software
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dsdp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dsdp 5.8-1
A free open source implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of an interior-point method for semidefinite programming
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dspam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/dspam 3.10.2-14
A scalable, open-source statistical anti-spam filter
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A scalable, free-software statistical anti-spam filter
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [fcitx-mozc] vague terminology "Open Source" and "Linux ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source” and “Linux”:
community/fcitx-mozc 2.20.2673.102-2
Fcitx Module of A Japanese Input Method for Chromium OS, Windows, Mac and Linux (the Open Source Edition of Google Japanese Input)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source” and “Linux” as operating system, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source” and “Linux” as operating system. Also it should avoid contains nonfree OSs in its description.
eg.
Fcitx Module of A Japanese Input Method for GNU/Linux (the Free Software Edition of Google Japanese Input)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/flightgear 2017.1.3-1
An open-source, multi-platform flight simulator
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software, multi-platform flight simulator
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear-data] vague terminology "Open Source" in de ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/flightgear-data 2017.1.3-1
Base-Data for the opensource flight-simulator.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Base-Data for the free-software flight-simulator.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freehdl] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/freehdl 0.0.8-8
An open-source (C++ generating) VHDL simulator
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software (C++ generating) VHDL simulator
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freevo] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/freevo 1.9.0-14
An open-source home theatre PC platform
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software home theatre PC platform
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gerbv] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/gerbv 2.6.1-4
An open source Gerber file (RS-274X only) viewer
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software Gerber file (RS-274X only) viewer
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-wayland] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/glfw-wayland 3.2.1-1
A free, open source, portable framework for graphical application development (wayland)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, portable framework for graphical application development (wayland)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-x11] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/glfw-x11 3.2.1-1
A free, open source, portable framework for graphical application development (x11)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software, portable framework for graphical application development (x11)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [goaccess] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/goaccess 1.2-1
An open source real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gocr] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/gocr 0.50-2
Open-source character recognition (OCR)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software character recognition (OCR)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [hyperion] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/hyperion 1.03.2-9
An opensource 'AmbiLight' implementation
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software 'AmbiLight' implementation
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [inn] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/inn 2.6.1-1
Complete open source Usenet system. De facto standard for handling news routing, news spool and serving the spool to customers.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Complete free software Usenet system. De facto standard for handling news routing, news spool and serving the spool to customers.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [irrlicht] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/irrlicht 1.8.4-1
An open source high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [irrlicht-docs] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/irrlicht-docs 1.8.4-1
An open source high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software high performance realtime 3D graphics engine.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [languagetool] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/languagetool 3.7-1
An open source language checker
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software language checker
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libasl] vague terminology "Free and Open Source hardwa ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Free and Open Source hardware”:
community/libasl 0.1.7-3
Free and open source hardware accelerated multiphysics simulation platform (Advanced Simulation Library)
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source” and “Free and Open Source hardware”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-hardware-designs.html
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source” and “Free and Open Source hardware”.
eg.
Free-design hardware accelerated multiphysics simulation platform (Advanced Simulation Library)
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libdlna] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/libdlna 0.2.4-16
Open-source implementation of DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance) standards
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software implementation of DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance) standards
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libnoise] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/libnoise 1.0.0-4
A portable, open-source, coherent noise-generating library for C++
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A portable, free-software, coherent noise-generating library for C++
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libopenshot] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/libopenshot 0.1.4-1
A high quality, open-source video editing, animation, and playback library for C++, Python, and Ruby.
According to: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A high quality, free-software video editing, animation, and playback library for C++, Python, and Ruby.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love08] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [luminancehdr] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [lxlauncher] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [lxlauncher-gtk3] vague terminology "Open Source" in de ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [manaplus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mathjax] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mediaproxy] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [metasploit] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mixxx] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mongodb] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mosquitto] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [obs-studio] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [ode] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opendkim] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opendmarc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openra] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openscenegraph] vague terminology "Open Source" in des ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opensips] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opensubdiv] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [pdfsam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [pokerth] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [polymake] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [portaudio] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [pymol] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|