|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [java-openjfx-src] vague terminology "Open Source" in d ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/java-openjfx-src 8.u121-1
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX) - sources
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (free-software implementation of JavaFX) - sources
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [kdegames-kigo] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/kdegames-kigo 17.04.0-1 (kde-applications kdegames)
An open-source implementation of the popular Go game
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software implementation of the popular Go game
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libgdiplus] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libgdiplus 4.2-1
An Open Source Implementation of the GDI+ API
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A Free Software Implementation of the GDI+ API
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libical] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libical 2.0.0-2
An open source reference implementation of the icalendar data type and serialization format
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software reference implementation of the icalendar data type and serialization format
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [liblouis] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/liblouis 3.0.0-2
Open-source braille translator and back-translator
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software braille translator and back-translator
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libofa] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libofa 0.9.3-6
An open-source audio fingerprint by MusicIP
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software audio fingerprint by MusicIP
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libomxil-bellagio] vague terminology "Open Source" in ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libomxil-bellagio 0.9.3-1
An opensource implementation of the OpenMAX Integration Layer API
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software implementation of the OpenMAX Integration Layer API
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libupnp] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/libupnp 1.6.21-1
Portable Open Source UPnP Development Kit
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Portable Free Software UPnP Development Kit
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mlt] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/mlt 6.4.1-6
An open source multimedia framework
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software multimedia framework
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [mlt-python-bindings] vague terminology "Open Source" i ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/mlt-python-bindings 6.4.1-6
An open source multimedia framework
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software multimedia framework
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [opencore-amr] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
Open source implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
extra/opencore-amr 0.1.5-1
Free software implementation of the Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) speech codec
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [openjpeg2] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/openjpeg2 2.1.2-2
An open source JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [sofia-sip] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/sofia-sip 1.12.11-3
An open-source SIP User-Agent library
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software SIP User-Agent library
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [swt] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/swt 4.6.2-3
An open source widget toolkit for Java
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software widget toolkit for Java
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [tomcat7] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/tomcat7 7.0.76-1
Open source implementation of the Java Servlet 3.0 and JavaServer Pages 2.2 technologies
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of the Java Servlet 3.0 and JavaServer Pages 2.2 technologies
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [tomcat8] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/tomcat8 8.0.42-1
Open source implementation of the Java Servlet 3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 technologies
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of the Java Servlet 3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 technologies
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [unixodbc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/unixodbc 2.3.4-2
ODBC is an open specification for providing application developers with a predictable API with which to access Data Sources
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
ODBC is a free specification for providing application developers with a predictable API with which to access Data Sources
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [wildmidi] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/wildmidi 0.4.0-1
Open Source MIDI Synthesizer
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free Software MIDI Synthesizer
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [x265] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/x265 2.4-1
Open Source H265/HEVC video encoder
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free Software H265/HEVC video encoder
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xapian-core] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/xapian-core 1:1.4.2-1
Open source search engine library.
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software search engine library.
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xsd] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/xsd 4.0.0-2
An open-source, cross-platform W3C XML Schema to C++ data binding compiler
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free-software, cross-platform W3C XML Schema to C++ data binding compiler
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [xvidcore] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
extra/xvidcore 1.3.4-1 [installed]
XviD is an open source MPEG-4 video codec
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
XviD is a free software MPEG-4 video codec
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [beignet] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/beignet 1.3.1-2
An open source OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
A free software OpenCL implementation for Intel IvyBridge+ iGPUs
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [bzrtp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/bzrtp 1.0.5-1
Opensource implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free software implementation of ZRTP keys exchange protocol
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [cimg] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
Task Description
This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:
community/cimg 1.7.1-1
Open-source C++ toolkit for image processing
According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open
It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.
eg.
Free-software C++ toolkit for image processing
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [displaycal] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dokuwiki] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dsdp] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [dspam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [fcitx-mozc] vague terminology "Open Source" and "Linux ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [flightgear-data] vague terminology "Open Source" in de ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freehdl] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [freevo] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gerbv] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-wayland] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [glfw-x11] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [goaccess] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [gocr] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [hyperion] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [inn] vague terminology "Open Source" in description of ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [irrlicht] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [irrlicht-docs] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [languagetool] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libasl] vague terminology "Free and Open Source hardwa ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libdlna] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libnoise] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [libopenshot] vague terminology "Open Source" in descri ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love] vague terminology "Open Source" in description o ... | Closed | |
|
|
Packages | Any | Freedom Issue | Medium | Low | [love08] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ... | Closed | |
|
