All Projects

ProjectCategory  ascTask TypePrioritySeveritySummaryStatusProgress
PackagesAnyImplementation RequestVery LowLow[qarte] add packageUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Request for :

qarte

“Allow you to browse into the archive of arte+7 & arteLiveWeb sites and to record your prefered videos.”

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qarte

License : GPL3

PackagesAnyReplace RequestDeferCritical[python2] replace deprecated Python 2 to TauthonDeferred
0%
Task Description

Description:

  • replace deprecated Python 2 to Tauthon for Canis Major

Additional info:

Steps to reproduce:

  • Broken python2 packages.
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python2-tornado] vague terminology "Open Source" in de...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/python2-tornado 4.5.1-1 [installed]
    open source version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

free software version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python2-scipy] vague terminology "Open Source" in desc...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/python2-scipy 0.19.0-1 [installed]
    SciPy is open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

SciPy is free software for mathematics, science, and engineering.
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueVery LowLow[python2-pyinotify]: using kernel name instead of opera...Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

community/python2-pyinotify 0.9.6-3 [installed]
     Python module used for monitoring filesystems events on Linux platforms with inotify.
 community/qlandkartegt 1.8.1-8

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueVery LowLow[python2-pam]: using kernel name instead of operating s...Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

community/python2-pam 0.1.4-3 [installed]
     Module that provides an authenticate function that allows the caller to authenticate a given username / password against the PAM sy stem on Linux.

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python2-biopython]: using vague "freely available" ter...Deferred
0%
Task Description
community/python2-biopython 1.69-1
    Freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#FreelyAvailable

Don’t use “freely available software” as a synonym for “free software.” The terms are not equivalent. Software is “freely available” if anyone can easily get a copy. “Free software” is defined in terms of the freedom of users that have a copy of it. These are answers to different questions.

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python-tornado] vague terminology "Open Source" in des...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/python-tornado 4.5.1-1 [installed]
    open source version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

free software version of the scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python-scipy] vague terminology "Open Source" in descr...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/python-scipy 0.19.0-1
    SciPy is open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

SciPy is free software for mathematics, science, and engineering.
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueVery LowLow[python-pyinotify]: using kernel name instead of operat...Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

community/python-pyinotify 0.9.6-3
     Python module used for monitoring filesystems events on Linux platforms with inotify.

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

PackagesAnyImplementation RequestVery LowLow[python-cheat] add package Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Hello,

Could it be possible to add this package :

python-cheat

“Cheat allows you to create and view interactive cheatsheets on the command-line.”

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-cheat/

https://github.com/chrisallenlane/cheat

License : GPL3

Thanks

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[python-biopython]: using vague "freely" term in descri...Deferred
0%
Task Description
community/python-biopython 1.69-1
    Freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#FreelyAvailable

Don’t use “freely available software” as a synonym for “free software.” The terms are not equivalent. Software is “freely available” if anyone can easily get a copy. “Free software” is defined in terms of the freedom of users that have a copy of it. These are answers to different questions.

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[pymol] vague terminology "Open Source" in description ...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/pymol 1.8.6.0-2
    Molecular visualization system on an Open Source foundation

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Molecular visualization system on a Free Software foundation
PackagesAnyFeature RequestMediumMedium[pybitmessage] Package RequestUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

PyBitmessage is a secure p2p e-mail alternative. It could be useful to package it.

https://github.com/Bitmessage/PyBitmessage/releases https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pybitmessage/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pybitmessage-git/ (contains a firejail profile)

PackagesAnyPrivacy IssueVery LowLow[purple-plugin-pack] Provides Napster support which is ...Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

purple-plugin-pack provides access to Napster which is only useful with a single company and sever (as far as I could tell).

PackagesAnyImplementation RequestVery LowMedium[purple-matrix] Please add packageUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Package is a libpurple plugin for the Matrix protocol which is consistent with Hyperbola’s social contract as Matrix is a federated protocol.

Source code can be found here licensed under GPLv2:

https://github.com/matrix-org/purple-matrix

PKGBUILD for git version is available here (last stable release is from two years ago so git version is probably the best version to use):

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/purple-matrix-git/

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[publicsuffix-list] vague terminology "Vendor" in descr...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Vendor”:

extra/publicsuffix-list 20170118.560.45a2bf8-1
    Cross-vendor public domain suffix database

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Vendor”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Vendor

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Vendor”.

eg.

Cross-supplier public domain suffix database
PackagesAnyFeature RequestVery HighHigh[prosody] needs OpenRC init script and contains systemd...Assigned
0%
Task Description

Description:

  • needs OpenRC init script and contains systemd files

Additional info:

  • prosody 1:0.10.r7198+.2fd20f372cb1+-2
prosody /usr/lib/systemd/system/prosody.service
prosody /usr/lib/sysusers.d/prosody.conf
prosody /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/prosody.conf

Steps to reproduce:

  • none
PackagesAnyUpdate RequestVery LowHigh[proj]: please update to latest versionUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

https://proj4.org/index.html

This package have valuable geodetic applications, and I intend to present Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre soon in universities and schools in East Africa.

The coordinate system there is not WGS84 and this package only in new version is providing the conversion from East African geographic coordinates to WGS84, and will be very usable in many industrial and private applications.

PackagesAnyImplementation RequestVery LowLow[powerpill] add packageUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Hello,

Could it be possible to add this package :

powerpill

“Pacman wrapper for faster downloads.”

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/powerpill/

https://xyne.archlinux.ca/projects/powerpill

License : GPL

Thanks

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[portaudio] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/portaudio 190600_20161030-1
    A free, cross-platform, open source, audio I/O library.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software, cross-platform, audio I/O library.
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[polymake] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/polymake 3.1-1
    Open source software for research in polyhedral geometry

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software for research in polyhedral geometry
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[pokerth] vague terminology "Open Source" in descriptio...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/pokerth 1.1.1-17
    Open source Texas Hold'em Poker simulator

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software Texas Hold'em Poker simulator
PackagesAnyImplementation RequestVery LowLow[plymouth] add packageDeferred
0%
Task Description

Plymouth is an application that runs very early in the boot process (even before the root filesystem is mounted!) that provides a graphical boot animation while the boot process happens in the background.

Please implement plymouth as an optional package.

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueVery LowLow[pkgdiff]: using kernel name instead of operating syste...Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

community/pkgdiff 1.7.1-1
     A tool for analyzing changes in Linux software packages

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueVery LowLow[pinta] mentioning proprietary software Paint.NETUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

The description of the package need to be changed to accommodate:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html

community/pinta 1.6-2 [installed]
     Drawing/editing program modeled after Paint.NET. It's goal is to provide a simplified alternative to GIMP for casual users

I am not quite sure what the policy is in Hyperbola on this one. I am referring to the reference to the proprietary software Paint.NET. That is for me steering users to verify what is Paint.NET – we shall not be doing it. It should be removed from description.

I am fine if authors have in documentation something explaining how they started software project. But I am not fine in descriptions which are public and accessible on Internet to have such references to illegitimate proprietary software.

Just to clarify, the word “alternative” is just fine in this description and need not be removed.

PackagesAnyUpdate RequestMediumHigh[php] is out of date/supportUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

From official PHP page, our php 7.1 is out of support and security

Our package :
https://www.hyperbola.info/packages/extra/x86_64/php/

PHP page :
https://www.php.net/supported-versions.php

PackagesAnyFeature RequestDeferLow[php-imagick] add packageUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

php-imagick is an optdepends for many PHP webapps like Nextcloud and Wordpress, would be good to have itin Hyperbola, Arch added it last year

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueVery LowLow[pflask]: using kernel name instead of operating system...Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

community/pflask 0.2.20151217-1
     Lightweight process containers for Linux

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

PackagesAnyImplementation RequestVery LowMedium[peertube] Add new PackageUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

Hi guys. Could they add PeerTube to Hyperbola?

It’s on AUR.

Under the AGPLv3 license

Additional info:

I see that the PeerTube help configuration with an init.d

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[pdfsam] vague terminology "Open Source" in description...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/pdfsam 3.3.0-1
    A free open source tool to split and merge pdf documents

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software tool to split and merge pdf documents
PackagesAnySecurity IssueVery LowMedium[patch] CVE-2018-6951 - NULL pointer DoSAssigned
0%
Task Description

An issue was discovered in GNU patch through 2.7.6. There is a segmentation fault, associated with a NULL pointer dereference, leading to a denial of service in the intuit_diff_type function in pch.c, aka a “mangled rename” issue.

https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-6951

PackagesAnyImplementation RequestVery LowLow[pacpl] Add packageUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Hello,

Could it be possible to add this package :

pacpl

“Convert multiple audio types from one format to another.”

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pacpl/

License : GPL

Dependencies needed (and currently missing in Hyperbola repo) :

perl-ogg-vorbis-header perl-mp4-info perl-mp3-tag perl-audio-flac-header perl-audio-musepack perl-parallel-forkmanager perl-cddb
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueVery LowLow[packeth]: using kernel name instead of operating syste...Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

community/packeth 1.8.1-1
     A Linux GUI packet generator tool for ethernet.

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueVery LowLow[oprofile]: using kernel name instead of operating syst...Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

community/oprofile 1.1.0-3
     System-wide profiler for Linux systems

See:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[oprofile] vague terminology "Linux" in description of ...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Linux”:

community/oprofile 1.1.0-3
    System-wide profiler for Linux systems

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Linux” as operating system, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Linux

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Linux” as operating system.

eg.

System-wide profiler for GNU/Linux systems
PackagesAnyImplementation RequestLowLow[opmsg] add new packageResearching
0%
Task Description

Description: opmsg is a replacement for gpg which can encrypt/sign/verify your mails or create/verify detached signatures of local files. Even though the opmsg output looks similar, the concept is entirely different.

Additional info:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opmsg/

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[opensubdiv] vague terminology "Open Source" in descrip...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/opensubdiv 3.1.1-1 [installed]
    An Open-Source subdivision surface library

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A Free Software subdivision surface library
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[openstreetmap-map-icons-svn]: using vague "public doma...Deferred
0%
Task Description

Description:

community/openstreetmap-map-icons-svn 31588-1 [installed]
    A set of public domain licensed map icons for general OSM use

It is questionable if it is “Licensed” or dedicated.

See the file:
/usr/share/licenses/openstreetmap-map-icons/svg-twotone/LICENSE.txt

it does not matter if the file is named “LICENSE”, it could be also named anyhow else.

There must be reason why the organization Creative Commons is not using the word “License” in that text, and that is why I propose to simply say in description:

    A set of public domain map icons for general OSM use
PackagesAnySecurity IssueMediumMedium[openssh] CVE-2018-15919Researching
0%
Task Description

Remotely observable behavior in auth-gss2.c in OpenSSH through 7.8 could be used by remote attackers to detect existence of users on a target system when GSS2 is in use. NOTE: the discoverer states ‘We understand that the OpenSSH developers do not want to treat such a username enumeration (or “oracle”) as a vulnerability.’ https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-15919

PackagesAnySecurity IssueVery LowCritical[opensmtpd] CVE-2020-8794Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/02/24/5 https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/new-critical-rce-bug-in-openbsd-smtp-server-threatens-linux-distros/

Qualys Security Advisory

LPE and RCE in OpenSMTPD’s default install (CVE-2020-8794)

Contents

Summary
Analysis
...
Acknowledgments

Summary

We discovered a vulnerability in OpenSMTPD, OpenBSD’s mail server. This
vulnerability, an out-of-bounds read introduced in December 2015 (commit
80c6a60c, “when peer outputs a multi-line response ...”), is exploitable
remotely and leads to the execution of arbitrary shell commands: either
as root, after May 2018 (commit a8e22235, “switch smtpd to new
grammar”); or as any non-root user, before May 2018.

Because this vulnerability resides in OpenSMTPD’s client-side code
(which delivers mail to remote SMTP servers), we must consider two
different scenarios:

- Client-side exploitation: This vulnerability is remotely exploitable

in OpenSMTPD's (and hence OpenBSD's) default configuration. Although
OpenSMTPD listens on localhost only, by default, it does accept mail
from local users and delivers it to remote servers. If such a remote
server is controlled by an attacker (either because it is malicious or
compromised, or because of a man-in-the-middle, DNS, or BGP attack --
SMTP is not TLS-encrypted by default), then the attacker can execute
arbitrary shell commands on the vulnerable OpenSMTPD installation.

- Server-side exploitation: First, the attacker must connect to the

OpenSMTPD server (which accepts external mail) and send a mail that
creates a bounce. Next, when OpenSMTPD connects back to their mail
server to deliver this bounce, the attacker can exploit OpenSMTPD's
client-side vulnerability. Last, for their shell commands to be
executed, the attacker must (to the best of our knowledge) crash
OpenSMTPD and wait until it is restarted (either manually by an
administrator, or automatically by a system update or reboot).

We developed a simple exploit for this vulnerability and successfully
tested it against OpenBSD 6.6 (the current release), OpenBSD 5.9 (the
first vulnerable release), Debian 10 (stable), Debian 11 (testing), and
Fedora 31.

The fix is delivered in OpenSMTPD 6.6.4p1, available here, which the developer recommends installing “AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.”

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[opensips] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/opensips 2.2.3-1
    An Open Source SIP Server able to act as a SIP proxy, registrar, location server, redirect server ...

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A Free Software SIP Server able to act as a SIP proxy, registrar, location server, redirect server ...
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[openscenegraph] vague terminology "Open Source" in des...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/openscenegraph 3.4.0-5
    An Open Source, high performance real-time graphics toolkit

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A Free Software, high performance real-time graphics toolkit
PackagesAnyBug ReportVery LowMedium[openrc] cannot load fuse at bootUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

I added
<quote>modules=”fs-fuse”</quote>
to /etc/conf.d/modules (and also “fuse” instead).

I looked in /var/log/rc.log and I see this line

<quote>modprobe: FATAL: Module fs-fusetun not found in directory /lib/modules/4.9.194-gnu-1-lts</quote>

It looks like modprobe added “tun” to the filename which prevents loading the module.

PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[openra] vague terminology "Open Source" in description...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/openra 20170421-1
    An open-source implementation of the Red Alert engine using .NET/Mono and OpenGL

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free-software implementation of the Red Alert engine using .NET/Mono and OpenGL
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueVery LowLow[openmw]: referring to assets in descriptionUnconfirmed
0%
Task Description

Description:

The description of the package need to be changed to accommodate:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html

To refer to published works as “assets”, or “digital assets”, is even worse than calling them “content” — it presumes they have no value to society except commercial value.

community/openmw 0.41.0-3.hyperbola1
    A libre engine reimplementation for Morrowind-based role-playing games, without wizard installation support to install nonfree assets from Morrowind to run Morrowind
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[openjpeg] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti...Unconfirmed
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/openjpeg 1.5.2-1
    An open source JPEG 2000 codec

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software JPEG 2000 codec
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[openjpeg2] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

extra/openjpeg2 2.1.2-2
    An open source JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software JPEG 2000 codec, version 2.1.2
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[opendmarc] vague terminology "Open Source" in descript...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/opendmarc 1.3.2-1
    Free open source software implementation of the DMARC specification

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

Free software implementation of the DMARC specification
PackagesAnyFreedom IssueMediumLow[opendkim] vague terminology "Open Source" in descripti...Deferred
0%
Task Description

This package contains vague terminology “Open Source”:

community/opendkim 2.10.3-4
    An open source implementation of the DKIM sender authentication system. Based on a fork of dkim-milter.

According to:
https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html

We shall avoid vague terminology such as “Open Source”, please see here:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Open

It would be good example to set to have proper description of packages without using “Open Source”.

eg.

A free software implementation of the DKIM sender authentication system. Based on a fork of dkim-milter.
Showing tasks 101 - 150 of 491 Page 3 of 10 - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - Last >>

Available keyboard shortcuts

Tasklist

Task Details

Task Editing