- Status Unconfirmed
- Percent Complete
- Task Type Freedom Issue
- Category Any
- Assigned To No-one
- Operating System All
- Severity Low
- Priority Very Low
- Reported Version Any
- Due in Version Undecided
-
Due Date
Undecided
- Votes
- Private
FS#904 - [retroarch-assets-xmb]: referring to assets in description
Description:
The description of the package need to be changed to accommodate:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html
To refer to published works as “assets”, or “digital assets”, is even worse than calling them “content” — it presumes they have no value to society except commercial value.
community/retroarch-assets-xmb 401-1 (libretro)
XMB menu assets for RetroArch
Why not use “elements” instead?